Laserfiche WebLink
Mabusth explained that the structure is located on a severely limited lot. The required setback <br />for a garage with the door opening toward the street is 30' and the garage is located 17" from <br />the street lot line and 29' from travelled road. It is located on a shared driveway. The required <br />• sideyard setback is 10' and the structure is 1'8" from the side lot line. <br />Smith asked if the applicant considered putting the garage at the end of the shared driveway. <br />Mabusth asked if they considered an attached structure. <br />Mr. Leech replied that he had not considered it. <br />Mabusth noted that a detached garage would have to be 10' from the principle structure. <br />Nolan asked if the sidewalk would be replaced and noted that there is a drainage problem as <br />water pools in the middle of it. <br />Smith noted the deck in the 0 -75' and asked if the deck was there when they purchased the <br />home. <br />Mr. Leech replied that the deck was there when they purchased the home. <br />Smith asked about what appears to be an erosion problem near the shoreline. <br />Mr. Leech responded that he is addressing the issue as they can afford to make improvements. <br />It was moved by Lindquist, seconded by Berg, to recommend approval of application #1861 <br />• for Jeffrey S. Leech, 720 North Arm Drive as listed subject to working with staff on drainage <br />problems. Vote: Ayes 6 Nays 1. Rowlette felt the hardcover issue should have been addressed <br />to find ways to reduce it. <br />• <br />Chairman Schroeder asked for a 5 minute recess. <br />(13) #1863 ROBERT LUESSE <br />3249 CASCO CIRCLE - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING <br />Mr. Luesse was present. <br />Mabusth explained that when the Commission originally approved the application it had <br />several other improvements. The garage was based on a former survey which showed the <br />garage 3' from the lot line. An updated survey shows the garage is 2'4" from the lot line. Mr. <br />Luesse was given opportunity to start construction by off - setting the structure 8" but he opted <br />instead to come back to the Commission with a new proposal. <br />Peterson asked if there were any comments from the neighbor to the north. <br />Mr. Luesse responded that he had talked with the neighbor but he did not have any concerns <br />regarding the proposal as he originally approved an extension along the existing setback. <br />15 <br />