My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/20/1993 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
09/20/1993 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2012 12:14:44 PM
Creation date
2/28/2012 12:14:44 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
There was some discussion as to the s.f. figures in the original hardcover survey and it was <br />discovered that some of the figures had been rounded off. <br />• It was moved by Rowlette, seconded by Nolan, to recommend approval of application # 1863 <br />for Robert Luesse, 3249 Casco Circle, for the amended variance application subject to the <br />installation of a firewall. Vote: Ayes 7 Nays 0. <br />(#14) #1864 IRWIN JACOBS <br />1700 SHORELINE DRIVE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING <br />Jim Jenson represented Mr. Jacobs. <br />Mabusth explained that the application involves a conditional use permit for a new caretaker <br />residence to replace an older caretaker residence on the original 2.7 acre parcel. Mabusth <br />explained that there were previous applications for variances for a guest house and oversized <br />accessory structures and those applications had been approved. <br />The structure meets the 100' lakeshore setback and that only a grade level patio is proposed <br />within the 75 -100' setback area which is allowed by the current code. The structure will also <br />be decreased by 349.8 s. f. <br />Peterson asked if anyone was able to view the property. <br />Rowlette responded that she went to the gate and the caretaker came to get her and showed her <br />around the property. <br />. Schroeder commented that there was a breakdown in communication and suggested that it be <br />addressed. <br />Peterson stated that he was not certain of whether he could vote on the property as he was <br />denied access to the property. <br />Mr. Jenson apologized for the breakdown in communication and said he would address it. <br />Schroeder asked why Mr. Jacobs wanted to build the structure. <br />Mr. Jensen replied that the existing structure is very old and in great disrepair. <br />Schroeder asked which Commission members were able to view the property and asked <br />whether it could be voted on now. <br />Rowlette commented that she had no problem with the proposal. She discovered in her <br />conversation with the caretakers that the structure doesn't even have a foundation under it - <br />it's just a dirt floor with wood over it. <br />Schroeder asked about the septic. <br />is 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.