Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> MINUTES FOR JANUARY 19, 2000 <br /> • <br /> (#2400 Mark and Arlette Ploen, Continued) <br /> City Staff is recommending approval of the lot line rearrangement subject to the following <br /> conditions: <br /> 1. Applicant shall dedicate drainage and utility easements along new property lines and vacate <br /> any drainage and utility easements along the old property line. <br /> 2. Applicant shall provide to the City any documentation relating to easements on both <br /> properties. <br /> 3. Prior to City Council review three original surveys of the survey completed by a licensed <br /> surveyor in the State of Minnesota shall be submitted,with signature blocks. <br /> 4. Variances be granted for lot width on both Lots A and B and both shall be considered <br /> Record Lots. <br /> 5. Applicant shall dedicate or quit claim right-of-way to Hennepin County. <br /> Weinberger stated the property currently is platted within a Hennepin County easement, with <br /> Hennepin County requesting that the easement be deeded over to the County, with Hennepin <br /> County then having full ownership of that portion of the property. <br /> Smith inquired whether the intent of the Applicants was to build on both lots or to sell one of the <br /> . lots. <br /> Mrs. Ploen indicated they intend to sell Lot B and leave Lot A as is. <br /> Hawn commented that Lot A will end up with two garages located on the property. Hawn inquired <br /> whether those garages will remain. <br /> Mrs. Ploen stated the garage located closest to Lot B will be removed. <br /> Kluth inquired whether a portion of the existing house is located within the Hennepin County <br /> easement. <br /> Weinberger stated this is a standard request by Hennepin County in subdivisions. Weinberger <br /> stated at the time the deeds to the properties are created for the two new lots, that a quit claim <br /> deeded be created dedicating this portion of the property to Hennepin County. Weinberger <br /> stated the property would actually be deeded over to Hennepin County. <br /> Kluth inquired whether that portion of the house would then be deeded over to the County. <br /> Weinberger stated this is a standard request by Hennepin County. Weinberger stated City Staff <br /> would be willing to work with Hennepin County on this issue. Weinberger stated an additional <br /> permit may be needed to retain the deck. <br /> Hawn inquired where the Applicant stood on deeding a portion of their property to Hennepin <br /> County. <br /> Mr. Ploen stated in his opinion the road needs to be widened in that area, and if the County <br /> • owns a portion of his residence, he would not be able to contest the widening of the road. <br /> Page 7 <br />