Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> MINUTES FOR JANUARY 19, 2000 <br /> • (#2400 Mark and Arlette Ploen, Continued) <br /> Weinberger stated the road would never be built up to the residence. Weinberger stated the <br /> County could elect to condemn the property. <br /> Hawn commented the two new lots would meet lot size but do not comply with the 140 foot <br /> width front yard setback. <br /> Stoddard inquired whether there were any precedents similar to this situation. <br /> Weinberger stated this lot line rearrangement is not increasing the housing density in this area, <br /> but would allow the Applicant to create two lots meeting the one acre zoning requirement. <br /> Weinberger stated these two lots would continue to be considered two housing units. <br /> Hawn stated in her view meeting the required lot size is an important factor to consider in this <br /> application. <br /> Smith inquired whether the Applicants are agreeable to the other conditions recommended by <br /> City Staff. <br /> Mr. Ploen indicated they are agreeable to the conditions. <br /> There were no public comments regarding this application. <br /> Smith moved, Kluth seconded,to recommend approval of Application #2400, <br /> • <br /> 4345/4365 North Shore Drive, Class I Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement, subject <br /> to the five conditions outlined in the January 12, 2000 Planner's Report and further <br /> subject to removal of the garage located closest to Lot B. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> Mrs. Ploen inquired when the garage would need to be removed. <br /> Weinberger indicated six months from the time of approval would be fine. <br /> (#3) #2550 CHARLES VAN EECKHOUT, 120 BROWN ROAD SOUTH, SUBDIVISION FOR <br /> PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, 7:32 p.m. -8:23 p.m. <br /> Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br /> Charles Van Eeckhout, Applicant, was present, along with John Berg, Loucks &Associates. <br /> Weinberger stated this application was reviewed at the November Planning Commission meeting, <br /> where the application was denied due to the number of issues to be resolved and concerns <br /> regarding DNR permits for sewer and driveway extension across Long Lake Creek, a protected <br /> waterway. <br /> The Applicant has submitted a revised plan for the subdivision to create an open space south <br /> of the creek, which eliminates any concerns with crossing the creek as well as concerns <br /> regarding bridging and extension of the sewer line across the creek. The DNR has requested <br /> the developer dedicate a conservation easement along the south boundary of the property to <br /> help preserve the natural area along the Luce Line Trail. <br /> • As it relates to sewer access to the Fox Ridge neighborhood, the best option would be to have <br /> Page 8 <br />