My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/18/1993 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
10/18/1993 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2012 12:14:44 PM
Creation date
2/10/2012 12:11:18 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />• HELD OCTOBER 18, 1993 <br />( #9) #{1884 ORVILLE FISHER - CONT. <br />Gaffron explained that the landscaper had suggested gray -twig dogwood as a species that would <br />thrive in this type of environment. <br />Nolan questioned the number of trees being replaced, noting there were many more trees cut <br />when the smaller trees and understory are considered. He felt the applicant may be getting just <br />what he wanted by clear cutting the area and then only replacing a few trees. This is similar <br />to the previous discussion about after - the -fact variances. The City would not want to set an <br />example that it is ok to do as you want and you have a problem only if you get caught. This <br />problem is really only paying a little extra money to get what you wanted in the first place. <br />Fisher stated this was not his intent. He had a surveyor identify each tree and its location so <br />the replacement would be in the same location. The new trees will actually provide more <br />screening than the lower boxelder trees that were previously there. From the house, the Fishers <br />actually looked over the boxelder trees while the new trees will be much taller and larger. They <br />will be placed in the exact location of the previous trees. Schroeder thought it would be a long <br />time before the trees would be large enough to impact the views. <br />Lindquist asked what could be done other than replant the larger trees and add some understory. <br />Schroeder thought that since this is a chance to make improvements, everything should be done <br />to make improvements. Lindquist stated that if the situation was to improve, more trees would <br />be required. <br />Fisher stated the project could become quite costly. Schroeder responded that, "With all due <br />respect, cost was not a relevant consideration since the situation was avoidable. The goal now <br />is to do the right thing for the City and protect the lake. " <br />Lindquist asked what would be a reasonable amount of plantings to replace what was destroyed. <br />Gaffron suggested the landscaper, Dale Gustafson, would be able to help resolve that issue. <br />Peterson stated that the Planning Commission was being asked to consider the after - the -fact <br />variance, not plan for the restoration. Schroeder indicated a restoration plan was included so <br />may need consideration. Nolan did not want to accept the plan as submitted. Smith added she <br />would like to see a combination of larger trees and understory to come close to restoring the <br />area as it was. <br />It was moved by Schroeder, seconded by Nolan, to deny Application #1884 for Orville Fisher, <br />475 Oxford Road, for an after - the -fact variance related to clear cutting in the restricted 0 -75' <br />zone. Staff is directed to work with the Fisher's landscape engineer to develop a plan that would <br />0 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.