My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/18/1993 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1993
>
10/18/1993 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2012 12:14:44 PM
Creation date
2/10/2012 12:11:18 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />0 HELD OCTOBER 18, 1993 <br />( #9) #1884 ORVILLE FISHER - CONT. <br />compensate for the large trees taken out and to plant understory so as to duplicate or improve <br />what existed prior to the clear cutting. This plan should be complete prior to the next Council <br />meeting so the plantings can be done as soon as possible this fall. Ayes 6, nays 0. <br />Huff commented that the Hennepin Soils office has criteria that has been established on a buffer <br />strip that may be helpful. <br />( #7) #1882 JOHN M. O'SULLIVAN /O'SULLIVAN'S <br />2420 SHADYWOOD ROAD - COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC <br />HEARING 10:15 P.M. - 10:55 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />John O'Sullivan was present. <br />Gaffron explained that in 1987 the City did a commercial site plan review for this property. <br />One of the City's requirements was that a fire lane be established. It was brought to the <br />attention of the building inspector by the Orono police that the fire lane is not accomplishing <br />what it was intended to do. The building inspector has required that the property owner stripe <br />and mark the fire lane. The property owner feels he should not be required to do so. This <br />application is essentially a request for an amendment to the commercial site plan approved <br />previously. <br />Schroeder asked why this application was before the Planning Commission. Gaffron explained <br />that it is part of the appeal process stated in the Code when the applicant does not want to <br />comply with City requirements. Because Mound is a contract city, the appeal process is to the <br />City Council, not to the State Fire Marshal. <br />O'Sullivan gave a summary of his position on how this situation came about. He noted in <br />February of 1988 he was given a permit that stated he complied with all conditions. He <br />indicated there never has been any striping or signage indicating a fire lane and he has operated <br />5 1/2 years without these. <br />O'Sullivan continued that on July 15, 1993 an Orono police officer tagged one of O'Sullivan's <br />employees for parking a motorcycle in the storefront, and that the employee told the officer that <br />other officers have stopped at the station and said they would not tag anyone for parking there <br />and it wasn't a legal fire lane. O'Sullivan noted that the citation ended up being revoked but <br />it became an issue with the Chief, and this resulted in a letter from Stephen Sullivan, Chief of <br />Police, to O'Sullivan, dated July 28, 1993. (O'Sullivan gave copies of this letter to Planning <br />Commission members.) <br />0 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.