Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />• HELD OCTOBER 18, 1993 <br />( #9) #1884 ORVILLE FISHER - CONT. <br />Melvin J. Peterson, who formerly lived on the property and is technically the current owner as <br />the closing has not yet taken place, expressed his concern over what impact the current problems <br />could have on the November closing. He did not know about any of the activity in the yard or <br />tree cutting. Fisher noted the title is a transfer for a Contract for Deed. Schroeder noted that <br />typically the Planning Commission deals with the owner of the property, not a future owner. <br />Since the issue is with the applicant, it will be assumed he is the owner. <br />Schroeder asked why Fisher wanted to cut the trees since he was fully aware of the City's <br />position of activity in the 0 -75' setback area because of previous problems. Fisher explained <br />they did not want to cut as many as were cut but wanted to gain additional views. Schroeder <br />asked how he would gain views by cutting only trees from 75' back since there would still be <br />trees in the 0 -75' area. Fisher responded that most of the larger trees were 60' and back and <br />thought that was beyond the 75' setback. He had assumed the water was at a high water mark <br />this year although he did not have a survey. He measured from the waterline with a tape <br />measure. Gaffron explained this would not work because the water is actually lower than <br />normal at a 929 elevation. Schroeder pointed out that had Fisher cut only from the 75' line <br />back, it would not have helped his views. <br />•Fisher did not want the area clear cut because there is a neighboring tennis court that he wanted <br />to be left screened. <br />Lindquist asked how large the trees being proposed for replacement would be. Fisher responded <br />they would be Ash and Linden trees as tall as those taken out and 4 -5" in diameter. Schroeder <br />asked if all trees taken out would be replaced, even those out of the 75' zone. Fisher confirmed <br />not all of them would be replaced. Lindquist asked if the proposed screen on the south side <br />would be done at the same time as the rest of the replacement. Fisher responded that currently <br />only 12 -13 trees were scheduled to be replaced in the 0 -75' zone. <br />Schroeder asked if the City could do anything about requiring tree replacement outside of the <br />0 -75' zone given the nature of this particular issue. Gaffron felt it could be tied to mitigation <br />of the area. <br />Peterson asked how staff felt about the planting proposal. Gaffron responded that there had <br />existed understory and screening, and that the replantings proposed might have a different <br />character which might be considered good or bad. If the root system is still in place, some of <br />the understory may grow back which would be better than if it were all grubbed out. <br />Nolan noted the 4 -5" trees to be replaced would require large equipment to do the work. He <br />felt understory would be desirable and asked about the discussion of gray -twig dogwood. <br />14 <br />