My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-28-2016 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2016
>
03-28-2016 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2016 11:00:27 AM
Creation date
4/19/2016 10:59:49 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 28, 2016 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />7. #16-3807 TOM GONYEA, ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, 425-595 OLD <br />CRYSTAL BAY ROAD NORTH, PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL — DRAFT RESOLUTION <br />AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT, PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL, <br />RESOLUTION NO. 6599 (continued) <br />Gaffron indicated the County has 100 feet further west, with the right-of-way being depicted by the black <br />line on the map. <br />Levang stated 10 feet for the County would not have the same impact as it would for Mr. Gonyea. <br />Gaffron stated the white line depicts the ditch. <br />Printup asked what would make the most sense for the City of Orono. Printup asked if the costs of the <br />trail would come out of the turnback money. <br />Loftus indicated typically the cities are responsible for trails. Loftus stated if it is outside the curb, the <br />local jurisdiction would pay for any improvements. <br />Mattick stated if the developer is requesting to put the trail outside of his property and the County is okay <br />with that, that cost would likely fall on the developer. <br />Gaffron noted the City in the past has given developers credit on park fees when they have constructed a <br />trail. Gaffron indicated the City did obtain an easement from JEM with no expectation as to when or how <br />that trail will be built and that there is an agreement that the City would pay for the trail if they were given <br />an easement. <br />Printup stated in his view it is important to get the easement for the future. <br />McMillan asked if the developer could plant trees on the easement. <br />Gonyea stated down the road any trees planted on the easement could create an issue for the City, and that <br />if trees are planted, it would be better on the County property or within the development. <br />Printup stated obtaining an easement over this property would also help serve as a guide for the properties <br />going westward and that the trail does not necessarily have to be built. <br />Gonyea pointed out the location of the proposed sidewalk within the development. Gonyea indicated he <br />can certainly look at the location of the sidewalk to see if it can be moved south a little bit to provide for <br />some berming. Gonyea asked if they would receive credit for the easement against the park dedication <br />fee. <br />Gaffron stated if a trail is constructed at the developer's cost, then that would be credited, but that they <br />would not get credit for the easement. <br />Gonyea asked whether the City would still want the internal sidewalk as well as a trail. <br />Levang commented that is a good question and that there might be some redundancy there. <br />Page 11 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.