My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-28-2016 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2016
>
03-28-2016 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2016 11:00:27 AM
Creation date
4/19/2016 10:59:49 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 28, 2016 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />7. #16-3807 TOM GONYEA, ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, 425-595 OLD <br />CRYSTAL BAY ROAD NORTH, PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL — DRAFT RESOLUTION <br />AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT, PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL, <br />RESOLUTION NO. 6599 (continued) <br />Gonyea indicated he could look at constructing the trail towards the back but that the berming is an <br />important feature for the residents abutting Highway 12. <br />Levang asked if he would eliminate the entire internal sidewalk. <br />Gonyea indicated he would eliminate the part that is parallel to the trail but still construct the other <br />portion of the sidewalk. Gonyea noted part of the objective with the layout was to have room to park a <br />car in the driveway, and if the sidewalk is not there, they would have some additional room to work with. <br />McMillan stated a trail that goes to the western boundary would not hook up into the development unless <br />there is a path to it. McMillan stated in her view this neighborhood would not really use the trail. <br />Printup stated they do not want a trail going nowhere, but if that one segment of sidewalk is benefitting <br />12 homes, the idea of an internal sidewalk is worth pursuing. Printup stated he is an advocate of having <br />the easement regardless of when the trail is built. <br />Gonyea stated if the City decided they wanted the trail along the northern edge of the property at some <br />point, he could provide the money to construct it in at a later date. Gonyea stated it does not make a lot of <br />sense now to put it in until the other properties are developed. <br />McMillan noted there will be a trail on the south side of Old Crystal Bay Road going to the east. If the <br />Dumas property gets developed and continues around the wetland, then an internal sidewalk would be <br />nice. McMillan stated she is usually hesitant about sidewalks but that in this case it makes sense. <br />Mattick stated sidewalks can be located within the public right-of-way and that the City does have the <br />right to make the abutting property owner responsible for clearing them. <br />Gaffron stated as they are currently laid out, they are within the right-of-way just outside the abutting <br />individual plot lines. <br />Gonyea asked if Staff could contact the County in the next few days to see whether they would be open to <br />platting the easement within their right-of-way. <br />Gaffron indicated he can speak with the County about the possibility of a trail on the south side and <br />whether they feel there is enough room within their right-of-way for that trail. <br />Cornick asked if any Highway 12 turnback funds would be available for the trail. <br />Loftus stated the City has been told that the turnback funds will cover the costs of anything that would be <br />replaced but that anything new would fall onto the local jurisdiction. <br />McMillan noted street lighting within this development was also an issue raised by Staff. <br />Page 12 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.