Laserfiche WebLink
. ` • � <br /> c�t� o� oR,o�o � <br /> • � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � NO. 1903 <br /> • � • • <br /> B) There is an existing 660 square foot cabin on the <br /> property, which cabin is approximately 6.5' from the side <br /> lot line and encroaching 15' into the 0-75' setback area. <br /> C) The property has been assessed for and is connected to <br /> the municipal sewer system. The property is served by an <br /> existing private well. � <br /> D) The property is subject to 75' lakeshore setbacks both <br /> front and rear. It is virtually impossible to rebuild on <br /> the property without hardcover variances. <br /> E) The configuration of the proposed house and lot is such <br /> that the tuck-under garage portion, in order to provide <br /> � sufficient room for cars to back out and enter safely onto <br /> • County Road 51, requires a 5' west side setback, and will <br /> encroach 23' into the 0-75' setback zone. <br /> F) The zoning code does not specify a required setback from <br /> a road easement; the proposed house is located 7' behind the <br /> � average street setback and the proposed open deck on the <br /> street side encroaches only 1' into the average street <br /> setback of the adjacent houses. <br /> G) The configuration of the proposed house is such that <br /> there is no encroachment on the average lakeshore setback of <br /> the adjacent houses. <br /> H) The configuration of the house and driveway as related <br /> to the existing topography of the lot is such that only <br /> minor grading work will be necessary in the 0-75' setback <br /> • zone. <br /> I) The tuck-under garage configuration with proposed 7' <br /> wide driveway minimizes the hardcover while maintaining the <br /> applicant' s concept of an acceptable home on the property. <br /> . J) The applicant's hardships are that the lot is very small <br /> and there is no adjacent land available for acquisition. <br /> • 4. The City Council has considered this application including <br /> the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, <br /> reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect <br /> of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the <br /> community. <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />