My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-14-2016 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
03-14-2016 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2016 9:14:07 AM
Creation date
3/17/2016 9:01:09 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
700
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 22, 2016 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 5 of 13 <br /> <br />8. RE-ROOFING OF SALT SHED ROOF (2700 KELLEY PARKWAY) AND NAVARRE <br />WATER TREATMENT PLANT GARAGE ROOF (2345 BLAINE AVENUE) (continued) <br /> <br />That contractor did confirm that both roofs need to be replaced and provided a quote for $3,900 for the <br />water plant garage and $6,600 for the salt shed. <br /> <br />Walsh asked if that is the low bid then. <br /> <br />Edwards noted the City went through a quotation process and received three quotations and then received <br />that bid later in the process. Edwards stated he will leave it up to the Council to decide whether they want <br />to accept the quotation received today. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if this bidder was aware of the other three bids. <br /> <br />Edwards stated he does not know. <br /> <br />McMillan noted the bids were published on the City’s website and that the quotes would have been <br />available to be viewed by anyone who went to the website. McMillan stated this bid was not really part <br />of the City’s process. <br /> <br />Walsh asked if the Council is going to take the higher bid. <br /> <br />McMillan stated in her view the process is just as important as the amount of the quote and that it is more <br />than a matter of saving $62. <br /> <br />Walsh stated he went out on his time to get this contractor out there to look at the buildings and that it <br />was his expectation he could submit a quote. <br /> <br />McMillan asked Council Member Walsh if he was asked to provide a contractor when he was called. <br /> <br />City Administrator Loftus indicated she did request the Public Works Director to reach out to Council <br />Member Walsh based on his comments last November about not being certain that the roofs needed to be <br />replaced. Loftus stated she suggested to the Public Works Director that Council Member Walsh be <br />invited to see the site, which was the reason he reached out to Council Member Walsh. <br /> <br />Walsh stated it was limited notice and that he jumped to get someone out there in order to help out in the <br />process. <br /> <br />Walsh stated he told Mr. Edwards that he was coming out with the roofing guy. Walsh stated he did not <br />need to be there since he would not be able to tell whether the roof needed to be replaced. Walsh stated <br />the process obviously was portrayed different to him in terms of what was going on. Walsh stated it was <br />the same thing with the tree stuff and that he provided a name of a contractor that the City could get in <br />contact with. Walsh stated it was his understanding this item was going to be on tonight’s agenda and <br />that he rushed out to get someone over there to take a look at it. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.