My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Inspections, ltrs, minutes re boathse deck
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
C
>
Casco Point Road
>
2659 Casco Point Road - 20-117-23-23-0022
>
Correspondence
>
Inspections, ltrs, minutes re boathse deck
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 3:54:04 PM
Creation date
3/10/2016 12:13:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
2659
Street Name
Casco Point
Street Type
Road
Address
2659 Casco Point Road
Document Type
Correspondence
PIN
2011723230022
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�ooE ��eciu[t�fh artd �urcdeon�� �../Fi. <br /> S. SCOTT STANDA, D.P.M., F.A.C.F.S. <br /> MICHAEL D. O'BORSKY, D.P.M., F.A.C.F.S. <br /> 287 MARSCHALL RD., SUITE 106 250 NORTH CENTRAL AVE., SUITE 314 <br /> SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 WAYZATA, MN 55391 <br /> TELEPHONE: (952) 445-5390 TELEPHONE: (952) 476-1376 <br /> FAX: (952) 445-5394 FAX: (952) 476-7454 <br /> E-MAIL: STANDADPM�UAOL.COM E-MAIL: STANDADPMCAOL.COM <br /> November 4, 2002 <br /> Lyle Oman, Building Official <br /> City of Orono Municipal Offices <br /> 270 Kelly Pkwy <br /> �rono, iV1�1 ��350 <br /> Dear Mr. Oman: <br /> This letter is just a follow up of our conversation of the 21s1 of October and it also is in response to your letter of <br /> October 17, 2002. This letter is more to give you my understanding of the chronology of this so that we are in <br /> agreement on this. My boathouse deck was replaced in April of 2001. I did the wark myself. Cost and materials <br /> was approximately$900. I replaced the deck because it was rotting and I believed it to be a danger. The <br /> dimensions to the deck were not changed when I replaced it. The deck does have a railing that meets code. I <br /> failed to get a permit to replace the existing deck because quite frankly I did not think I needed to get a permit to <br /> replace an existing structure that did not change the dimensions. However, because of an inspection by someone <br /> in Orono they decided that I needed a permit to do this. In fact I did place an application for a retroactive perrnit in <br /> July of 2001. With this I sent a check, which was twice the cost because it was a retroactive permit. I also <br /> provided documents, sketches and photograph of the pre-existing deck. I did not hear anything about this until <br /> your letter of October 17, 2002. <br /> So, in summary, approximately 15 months went between my application for a retroactive permit with check <br /> included and this letter that I received from you on October 17. I know you are very busy with all the construction <br /> going on and that you are overworked with all the issues under your jurisdiction. I do not have to walk very far <br /> from my house to look at houses that are blotting out the sun that have been recently remodeled, so, my question <br /> would be, what happened? Again, my position in this matter is that I replaced a pre-existing deck with dimensions <br /> ai t'r�e pre-existing ailner�sions and iiie ueck was replaced because it was structurally unsouna. i dici th�work <br /> myself and the cost of material was $900. This has now taken 15 months to resolve for actually no change in my <br /> property. I would like this resolved at the soonest possible time. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> ��_..t���fz� <br /> S. Scott Standa, DPM Mailing Address : P.O. Box 66 <br /> SSS/soap/sb Crystal, MN. 55323 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.