My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-01193 (Building)
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Baldur Park Road
>
1400 Baldur Park Road - 08-117-23-31-0001
>
Permits/Inspections
>
2015-01193 (Building)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:43:02 PM
Creation date
1/14/2016 1:33:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
1400
Street Name
Baldur Park
Street Type
Road
Address
1400 Baldur Park Rd
Document Type
Permits/Inspections
PIN
0811723310001
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. � <br /> ���� � <br /> �'�t�pl�ans delivered to me by Dean on Monda st 11 (see Attachment B) continued to use the 12/12 pitch <br /> roof; the exterior wall intersects the=��a a p�'�proxi�nately 6.fe�t al�ovg.t�e.floor,_and therefore does not <br /> meet the first condition for a half-story. The plans also indicate the use of some sort of a truss system atop;a <br /> knee-wall, apparently in an attempt to meet the no-more-than-60%-exceeding-five-foot-height condition. If`=�,,� <br /> does not meet that second condition for a half-story because the interior height is measured from the floor to the <br /> rafters,not from the floor to some point on a truss that might be, in this case, 5-6 feet below the rafters. A truss <br /> cannot be considered as a rafter. <br /> '�---_-------�,������Q-���.��..--�.���a�.��.� ��.�.:-��;�,-��,�,.��r_,.�:�..>��.�-�_.. - �.... �;`s <br /> ',,�- _ _ - ,-�, - <br /> Attachment C is an uncluttered and simplified depiction of the requirements for a floor to be considered as a <br /> half-story. <br /> - The point at which the exterior wall intersects the roof is labeled as Point A. That point is not defined by the <br /> underside or any other part of a roof overhang. It must be defined by the extended line of the outer surface <br /> of the exterior wall and the upper surface of the roof. <br /> - The point at which the interior height is measured, is from the floor to the rafters. It is not measured to <br /> some point along the lower edge of a scissor truss or some other internal structural member that is lower <br /> than the rafters. <br /> - The area between the bottom of the rafters and the floor that has a height of more than 5 feet, cannot exceed <br /> 60%of the floor area, in order for the condition to be met. <br /> An analysis of the house wing has also been completed (see separate attachment). I have briefly reviewed the <br /> updated survey which came in yesterday(Tuesday August 12) and it shows the house wing being lowered 2.0 <br /> feet into the ground with the main floor now being at elev. 949.2'. In order to determine whether dropping it 2 <br /> feet accomplished the goal, I used an iterative process that dropped it in 1-foot increments until it reached the <br /> 50%exposed standard. My calculations indicate that the main floor would have to be lowered to elev. 948.7' in <br /> order for the lower level to be defined as a basement. <br /> The definition of building height states that "A�tificially raising the grade adjacent to the foundation of a <br /> structure (by filling or by a combination of filling and retaining walls) above the suprounding natural terrain <br /> shall not be allowed as a method for converting a defined story to a defined basement, �egardless of any other <br /> benefits to the properry of such action. Finished grade that increases more than one foot fpom existing <br /> ground level shall be considered as artificiallv raisinF the Frade."Mark Gronberg had suggested that raising <br /> the height of finished grade around the foundation by no more than one foot above the existing grade could be <br /> used as a method to make the height work if the house needed to go more than 2 feet into the ground. I agreed, <br /> and then fully expected that the grading plan would show some filling around the foundation. However,the <br /> submitted grading plan does the opposite—it excavates along the foundation to create drainage swales, and <br /> therefore doesn't accomplish anything. The other option Dean had offered was to use 18"trusses instead of 24" <br /> trusses for the main floor. The downside of that is the need for an additional step down in the interior stairway <br /> system. The house wing revisions supplied to date have not accomplished the goal of making the house wing <br /> lower level a basement. <br /> Soren — I have not completed the staff report on this, and I'm not sure whether it makes any <br /> sense to bring it back to the PC next Monday. As it stands right now, the applicants have not <br /> submitted a plan that works. Bottom Line—All of this has been submitted too late for the <br /> applicants to react to my analysis in time for Monday's PC meeting. I am not in the office <br /> Friday and tomorrow is already totally filled up with other stuff. My staff report at this point <br /> z <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.