Laserfiche WebLink
. y <br /> � 't►u,ill �e short and sweet: 1) They haven't yet successfully addressed the stories issues. 2) They <br /> have lowered the peak height to 982' which is about 2 feet lower than the original plan, <br /> leaving the peak 3.5 feet above the Meerkins-Weiler walkout patio and 5.9 feet below their <br /> main floor deck. 3) We reject the neighbor's attorney's notion that the Alness patio is <br /> structural coverage by virtue of being adjacent to a single house wall. 4) We reject neighbor's <br /> attorney's interpretation of our bluff ordinance—the site does not contain a bluff. 5) Staff <br /> recommends that PC recommend denial of the height (number of stories) variance that is still <br /> needed. PC should make a recommendation with regards to the average setback variance— <br /> does the reduced peak height mitigate the neighbor's view issues regarding a new home <br /> extending past the average setback line? <br /> Lets discuss how we/I should proceed, given the circumstances. Could give applicants the <br /> option of removing from agenda, but may make the most sense to just go to PC as is... <br /> Uff da <br /> Mike <br /> Michael P.Gaffron <br /> Senior Planner <br /> City of Orono <br /> (Street Address)2750 Kelley Parkway <br /> (Mailing Address)P.O.Box 66,Crystal Bay,MN 55323 <br /> Phone:(952)249-4622 <br /> Fax: (952)249-4616 <br /> 3 <br />