My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-21-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
09-21-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:23:25 PM
Creation date
1/13/2016 8:59:50 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
418
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MIlITUTES OF T� <br /> ORONO PLANNIl�iG COMNIISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,Auguet 17,2015 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. �:� <br /> ti� <br /> � <br /> Stedman stated the driveways will be done by the individual owners as well as the building pads. <br /> Laskinen asked whether the Planning Commission has any concerns over werland buffers as it relates to �� <br /> � <br /> Item No. 2. <br /> Gaffron stated there needs to be confirmation from the Watershed District on what the buffers will be <br /> before proceeding forward since there is a chance for potemial changes to lot lines. Gaffron stated in his <br /> view it would be helpful to have that information before moving forward. <br /> Leskinen stated Item No. 3 relates to the proposed public cul-de-sac road length if Heritage Lane i.s <br /> extended. Leskinen asked wheti�er the Planning Commission has any concerns with the 1,600 foot road <br /> length. <br /> Thiesse stabed the City should considar changing it to 1,6{10 feet since the City and Fire Departn�ent <br /> continually allows i� <br /> Leskinen stated for discuss�on of this particular development, it appears the Plattning Commission has no <br /> concern with the length of t�e road. <br /> Leskinen stated Item No. 4 relates to cul-de-sac design and�ocation and the impact on the adjoiming <br /> properties. Leskinen stated the options would be to keep the two cul-de,sacs or takmg out#he wutgs on <br /> one. <br /> Thiesse stated he is a proponent for not l�aving a cul-de-sac in ffie middle of the street siunce the cul-de-sa.c <br /> would encourage peaple to do a U-turn in the middle of t�e road. Thiesse stated the school bus wovld <br /> need to go a block furthe�r and then utilize the new cul-d�sac. <br /> Gaffron stated when it comes to tha retaining wall situataon,the developer is talkzng about filli,ng a <br /> wetland and having a conidor. The developer is attempting to hold ti�:e retaining wal�s within that 50-fot <br /> corridor but that the City does not know how tall those walls will be and w�at the visual impact to the <br /> neighbors on either side wi�l be. <br /> Gronberg stated to his lrnowledge they would be zn the four to five foot range. <br /> Page 57 of 65 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.