09-21-2015 Planning Commission Packet

Home Browse Search

Mav�rEs oF� ORONO PLANNIl�IG COMIVIISSION MEETiNG Monday,Angnst 17,2015 , 6:30 o'c[ock p.m. '�� �� Thiesse nobed they would only be driving by one family rat�►er than a number of families and that the I' � ��p" developer nee�is to look at it to see whethet it can be done. � Lemke commented there could also be restrictions placed on the time of construction traffc. Leskinen stated she is not sure whether that is within the City's authority given the fact that an vrdinance already exists govenaing that. Landgaver noted the City dealt with a similar situation on Watertown Road where they limited tha time when trucks could deliver fill. Leskinen stated there are potentially some options to limit it Lemke asked if it would make sense to table the application pending further investigation. Leskinen skated that goes without saying aa�d that ti�e number one question is an alternative access to tbese homes during construction. Lcskinen noted St�{f's report con#ains a numb�r of items that need to be discussed and bhat�e Planning Commission should attempt to go through those before tabIing the application. I,andgraver stated the Planning Cono.mission should go through the list given the number of people that have turned out for this application. Leskinen stated the Planning Coznmission is not discounting the access,but until the City finds out if there is a Plan B, it will all be conjecture. Leskinen stated the Planning Commission will address some of the other issues in relation to this proposal. Leskinen noted Mark Granberg has addressed each of the City Engincer's comments and that it is not necessary for the Planning Commission to go through t�ose again. Leskinen asked whether the developer intends to do any grading of individual driveways or building pads as part of the initiai developme�at improvements. Page 56 of 65