Laserfiche WebLink
h � <br /> 1VIINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING CONIlVIISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,August 17,2015 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. , <br /> � <br /> Thiesse pointed out the profile appears to have them at eight to nine fee�t. ��� <br /> � <br /> Gronberg stated there could be some areas where they will be seven or eight feet tall. <br /> Thiesse noted those would be visible to the neighborhood. <br /> Gronberg stated they will try to have some type of decoratrve wall,but if the neighbors would like to have <br /> screening,they could aLso plant trees aiong there to hide it. <br /> Leskinen asked if there are any altarnatives to the walls. <br /> Thiesse noted rt is a 3:1 slape and that the walls are probably necassary. <br /> Gaffron stated it would require having a slope out into the neighboring property if a wall was not <br /> constcucted. Gaf�'ron stated there will be im�acts to the neighboring property regardless if the waZl is <br /> const�vcted or not. <br /> Leskinen asked whether the Planning Commission should reconnmend conservation easements over the <br /> tree stands ide3ntified in the Conservation Design report. <br /> Gaf&on recommended requiring conservation easements arownd different areas that woald not impact <br /> people building homes. <br /> Landgraver nobed the applicant was apen to restr�ictions over those azeas. <br /> Leskinen stated to the extent the Planning Commission could ask for that,thax should be done. <br /> Leskinen stated Item No. 6 relates to a traal connection corridor. Leskinen noted the neighbarhood is not <br /> in favor of that. <br /> Gaffron s�ated if t1�e neighborhood is not in favor of it,there is no reason to do it. <br /> Page 58 of 65 <br />