My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-21-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
09-21-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:23:25 PM
Creation date
1/13/2016 8:59:50 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
418
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� _ <br /> NIINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLAN�'ING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,August 17,2015 �\�: <br /> 6:30 dcfock p.m. ,� <br /> �1" <br /> �� <br /> Stedmau stated it is important to focus on the fact that there is a very natural division consisting of buffer ���� <br /> between the residence and the lots to the north. The bjuf�has a 20 to 30 pencent drop in grade, and a <br /> tremendous amount of tree removal would have to happen if a road was constructed through there. <br /> Stedman stated in his opinion it was good planning in 1965 on the way it was platted. <br /> Stedman noted they did have a neighborhood meeting on July 28 that was very well attended. The <br /> neighbors were interested in finding o3rt whether tlaere is another access point an the property,traf�"iic <br /> concerns were expressed,and the impact of construction tiaffic was discussed. Stedman indicated they <br /> are very interested in workiing with them,particularly on tamdscaping. <br /> Stedman stated it is also important to point out thst the building pads are 600 to 700 feet away from the <br /> nea,rest house. The driveways wi11 be kept away from the trees as much as possible. Stedman stated he <br /> would like to get same 'vnput from some custom home bui�lders on whether the house pads should be <br /> graded and that he hopes to have an answer on that in the near future. <br /> Mark Gronberg, Surveyor,stated a bluffanalysis was compieted when a piece of property was split off <br /> appraximately a year ago arid that he would be glad to go over it with ti�e City to see wb�ether it needs to <br /> be expanded or subtracted. Gronberg stated t�ey also did a preliminary stormwater management plan and <br /> depicted where the pond might go but it is a little bit dependent on the cul-de-sac and road design. <br /> Gronberg stated the stormwater routing along Dakota TraiI is where the drainage gces currently but#hat <br /> he would be willing to look at something different if the City recoznmends i� Gronberg indicated they <br /> may have to dig the pond deeper down if the starmwater panding goes near the cul-de-sac,which has <br /> more impact. Gronberg stated he can discuss that with t�e City Engineer but that in his view it would be <br /> better if i#was a little furt�►er away from the cul�e-sac. <br /> Gronberg stated as it relates to temporary street construction easemeuts,that is why they show the <br /> re�taining walls,which will help keep the excavator within ti�e 50-foot right-of way. Crronberg stated he is <br /> anticipating the retaining walls will need to be engineered. Gronberg noted they wi1l not be asking the <br /> neighbors for easements. <br /> Page 45 of 65 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.