My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-21-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
09-21-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:23:25 PM
Creation date
1/13/2016 8:59:50 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
418
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. , <br /> NIINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING CONIlVIISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,Angust 17,2015 <br /> 6:3Q o'clock p.m. �:��,` <br /> The final landsc lan will be submi ' r to final � <br /> a}�e p tted prio plat�d that they are certainly agreeable to � <br /> preserving as many trees as possible and are open to some conservation areas near the road. �� <br /> � <br /> Gronberg stated a homeowners association will be establisbed and t�hat they are aware of the requiremen,t <br /> for permits from the Minnehaha Czeek Watershed District. Gronberg indicated the maintenance <br /> agreerraent for stormwater facilities will be taken care of ti�rQugh the homeowners association. I?raingge <br /> and utility easemems will be provided a.g well as flowage and conservation easements. Crronberg stated a <br /> lot of these aze fairly standard. <br /> As it relates to the wetland buffer widths,the delineation shows it is a Pneserve I wetland,which requires <br /> a 40-foot buffer with a 10-foot setback, but that they will confmn that with the Watershed District. <br /> Gronberg noted they actually added the 10 feet on t�e setbacks already but that they can clarify th$i so rt <br /> is clear where the 40-foot setback is. <br /> Gronberg stated as it relates to the proposed a buffer along the existing driveway for Lot 4,ihe driveway <br /> was there a long time before buffers were required aad tha#typicalIy the A�ICWD will require buffer <br /> averaging. Gronberg indicated they will make that u�somewhez�e along the south side. <br /> Gronberg indica.ted they agree that the street should be public and that tbey do no#care whether the <br /> existmg cul-de-sac is rebnoved or not. Gronberg stated one way to do it is to perhaps couId take out the <br /> blacktop out and keep the right-of-ways so the easements are intact Cironberg sta�d they are in <br /> agreement with the recommendation on t�e road width. <br /> Crmnberg noted they showed the vertical curve dgta on the road plan and there is just a small little curve. <br /> Crronberg stated tihe sbreet is pretty much straight and t�.e slight curve should not be an issue. The typical <br /> str�eet se�tions will also be showm on the drawings. <br /> Frank Svoboda, Svoboda Ecologicat Resources, stated with respect to the status of the wetland <br /> delineation review,he received an e-mail from the Watershed District approxirnately one weeic ago which <br /> vndicated that appcoval will be coming relatively soon. The City's Consulting Engineer raiseci s�me <br /> concern about invasive species and the fact that th�e Conservation Design plan only addressed invasive <br /> species wil�in the buf.fers. Svoboda stated they can certainly modify it to include the three lots. Svoboda <br /> stated in their review of the site,there was some buckthorn along the lakeshore but it was mostJy found in <br /> Page 46 of 65 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.