Laserfiche WebLink
. , <br /> MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING CONIlVIISSION MEETING ; , <br /> Monday,August 1.7,�015 ����� <br /> 6:30 o'c�ock p.m. <br /> � <br /> � <br /> that serves more than 1 U dwelling units to be 32 feet in width. Staff does not believe there is any logic in ���' <br /> suddenly ending a 24-foot wide road and starting a 32-foot wide road, so Staf�is expecting the z�ew road � <br /> will be at 24 fcet width as well. The proposed road�xtension would be platted as a pubtic road. <br /> In the Conservation Design Report there are a number of things that need to be updated. Ga$'ron <br /> suggested the applicants be asked to address that. StafPs concez�n is that there are a number of significant <br /> tree stands that are not addressad in terms of a conservation management plan and it may be prudent to <br /> look at some sort of conservation easement arouzzd the perimeters of the pro}�erty or in certain selact <br /> areas. <br /> Although the Park Commission has not reviewed thc proposed piat, it is anticipated that no land for a <br /> public paxk is requ.iz�ed. The CMP does not ideIItify sny proposed trails along County Road 15 but the <br /> property does abut the Dakota Rail Regional trai�. It znay be worthwhile to have a discussion as to <br /> wfiether a trail connection corridor should be dedicated from the new cul-de-sac to the trail for <br /> neighborhood use. The Park Dedication fee for the three new bui.lding lats would be $5,550 per lot for a <br /> totai of$16,b50. <br /> Crea.tzoz�of the public road extension will require stormwater management measures. The wetland <br /> boundary delineation report has been submitted for review and approval by tha MCWD and approval has <br /> not yet been received. The City wiIl require a Conservation and Flowage Easemen#over each of the <br /> wetlands as well as impose standard wetlaad setbaak requiremez�ts. <br /> The applicant has suggested that they would like to establish a joint use dock on Smith's Bay south o� <br /> County Road IS to provide access for larger boats. Whethar such a dock couId be estabJashed is orrtside <br /> the scape of this subdivisian review and a separate applicatian would need to be filed with the City. <br /> The Planning Comm.ission should discuss the following: <br /> 1. Does the deve�oper i�ntend to do any grading of individual driveways or building pads as part of <br /> the in.ztial development improvements? <br /> Page 42 of 65 <br />