Laserfiche WebLink
. <br /> MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING CONIlI�SSION MEETING <br /> Monday,May 18,2015 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Gafhon stated the parcel that would not be developed likely would be platted as an outlo� If it is not <br /> platted as an outlot but platted as a lot,there would need to be septic testing completed and the lot would <br /> be subject to stormwater and drainage trunk fees. Gaffron stated there is not a problem with leaving it as <br /> an outlot. The other option would be to combine it with the adjoining property. <br /> Gaffron stated from Staf�s perspective,what has been presented is in general a good layout,and if <br /> everything tests fine for septic,he would not have a problem with it. <br /> BolIis stated since they have submitted their sketch plan,the onsite review by the Watershed was <br /> completed. Bollis indicated the wetland on Lot 2 is actually considerably smaller than what was <br /> originally delineated. The ftrs#80 feet of the wetland was determined to be upland,which helps a lot with <br /> building pad and septic. Bollis stated ti�e open ponds are proposed ponds for stormwater management <br /> and are not natural wetlands. <br /> Thiesse asked about the existing cul-de-sac aad whether it would be made a through roa�. <br /> Gaffron stated it is pla#ted as an outlot up to a certain point with a separate tax parcel at the end. Gaffron <br /> stated one ofthe discussion points as this plan progresses is whether one of the cul-de-sacs could <br /> disappear. Since it is platted,tb.ere would need to be a varation of that outlot and perhaps be combined <br /> with one ofthe adjacent lots. <br /> Thiesse stated it could be a nice turnaround halfway there except it could potentially create a traffic <br /> problem if someone was coming over the hill. Thiesse asked if there is surmountable curb on the cuI-de- <br /> sac. <br /> Bollis stated there is surmountable curb on the cul-do-sac and that it would be nice to remove that if <br /> possible. Bollis noted there is a similar cul-de-sac in Graham Hill approximately 1,500 feet in length. <br /> Leskinen asked what the total length of the raad is. <br /> Gaffron indicated it is approximately 1,500 feet from Watertown Road. <br /> An audience member asked if public comment would be allowed. <br /> Gaffron noted this is a sketch plan review and that the public is not no#ified and public camments are <br /> typically not taken,but the Planning Commission has t1�e option of accepting public comments. <br /> Chair Leskinen stated she would allow public comments. <br /> Susan Fleming,300 Stubbs Bay Road, stated they would be very disappointed ifthat turned into a road <br /> going out to Stubbs Bay Road. Fleming asked whether these homes are going to be walkouts or single- <br /> level homes,because they would be looking directly at three level homes if they are walkouts. FIeming <br /> stated in her view Lot 6 is a really flat lat and that she is not sure how they could put a walkaut there. <br /> Dick Stubbs,4U0 Stubbs Bay Road, stated they will not want a driveway on the north end since it is really <br /> low land that floods out every spring. <br /> Gaffron stated he is not sure if there is an answer to define what type of house could go on Lat 6. <br /> Page 33 of 37 <br />