Laserfiche WebLink
. <br /> MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETII�TG <br /> Monday,May 18,2015 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Bollis stated what is being depicted is a boilerplate house pad and is not going to be the exact house irt <br /> that location. Bollis stated Lat 6 could accommodate a walkout but that it would be up to the builder. <br /> Boltis indicated he would like to design the homes according to the topography ofthe lots. <br /> Landgraver stated before the applicant goes before the City Council,he may want to consider same type <br /> of landscaping or screening to minimize the impacts to the neighbors. <br /> The Planning Commission took no formal action on this item. <br /> 7. #15-3732 CTTY OF ORONO,AMEND CITY C�DE SECTION 78-1 DEFINITIONS,ADD <br /> BARBER SHOP5 AND BEAUTY SHOP, 10:05 P.M.—10:20 P.M. <br /> Curtis stated the City was recently approached with a reyuest to operate what was described as a high-end <br /> nail salon in an existing building in Navarre. Barber shops and beauty shops are permitted uses within the <br /> B-1 retail sates business district,the B-3 shopping center district, and the B-S limited neighborhood <br /> business district. <br /> Currently there is no definirion outlini.ng what services are included in a barber shop or beauty shop <br /> within the zoning code. Staff is not proposing a change per se but rather to add a def nition and perhaps <br /> the types of services to be provided so that when a similar question comes up,Staff would be better to <br /> answer it. Curtis noted it is not unusual for the use to be specifically defined,but that this is an <br /> opportunity for the City to put some parameters on the use. <br /> Staff has done some preliminary reseazch as a starting point for the Planning Commission's review. IrE <br /> Sta.ff's view,the Plymouth definition encompasses a number of the services that would normally be <br /> common. Sta�'is not proposing to change any of the language regarding th�City's massage licenses. <br /> Curtis requested the Planning Commission look over the options and provide Staff with some guidance. <br /> Thiesse asked if the Planning Commission went with the Plymouth definition as it relates to nonsurgical <br /> cosmetic procedures,whether tattoo replacement and removal would be included in that or construed to <br /> be included. <br /> Curkis stated that is a good question and that the Planning Commission could decide whether it should be <br /> included in the definition. <br /> Schcenzeit statad if the definition dces not specif ca11y exclude that,it likely still would be covered given <br /> the broad language in the Plymouth definition. <br /> Curtis stated the Plymouth definition 1s 2 starting point that the Planuung Commission cot�ld use. <br /> Leskinen opened the public hearing at 10:13 p.m. <br /> There were no public comments regarding this application. <br /> Chair Leskinen closed tl�e public hearing at 10:13 p.m. <br /> Page 34 of 37 <br />