Laserfiche WebLink
l � <br /> MINUTES OF THE <br /> URONO PLANNING COMNIISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,May 18,2015 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Bollis indicated that is correct. Bollis stated if they were to plat a conidor out to Stubbs Bay Road,he <br /> would tike to discuss what the purpose of the corridor would be, Bollis stated there is zero intent for <br /> future development of that parcel, and even if there were a corridor out to Stubbs Bay, it would not serve <br /> anything if someone were to develop that. Bollis indicated the potential lots off of Stubbs Bay Road <br /> would have access off of Stubbs Bay Road, <br /> Thiesse stated eliminating the cul-de-sac off af Stubbs Bay Road would simply force the road further <br /> down and then require the road to come back up and atound. <br /> Bollis noted there would also be a number of trees that would be impacted. <br /> Thiesse asked if the roadway coming off the e�sting cul-de-sac is pretty steep. <br /> Bollis stated there is a tiny section of the property that has an 18 percent grade in Lot 2. Bollis stated it <br /> would be less thaz� 1,W0 square feet. Bollis stated the homes would be walk-outs and very little grading <br /> would be required. <br /> Thiesse asked if the applicant would be connecting his house to the cul-de-sac. <br /> Bollis indicated he would be. <br /> Gaffron asked if that potentially eliminates the corridor off of Stubbs Bay. <br /> Bollis stated in his view it would skay in owzxership to that piece of property and gotentially nat be used. <br /> Gaffron noted between I,ots 4 and 5 the property line goes through the septic field. <br /> Bollis indicated it would cut off e comer of the sepric site, <br /> Thiesse noted a new septic system would likely be required if a new home is built. <br /> Gaffi'on stated they would need two sites that could be utilized for septic. <br /> Leskinen indicat.ed she is in agreement with Gaffron regazding Lots 1 and 2 and to leave the width as is <br /> given how the wetland limits the placement of the house. <br /> Gaffron stated the wefland could perhaps be split between the two lots,which would leave both lots at <br /> 175 feet. Gaffron stated he does not know,however,if there is a justification to vary on that. <br /> Landgraver asked how the applicant feels about compressing Lots 5,6 and 7 into two lots rather than <br /> three. <br /> Bollis stated the way t4iey have the house pads on the lots currently,they are conforming and it will <br /> depend on the septsc testing. <br /> Leskinen stated it appears to be a reasonable plan but the chain of cul-de-sacs might be a little concerning. <br /> Leskinen stated she is not sure what can be done to resolve tha� <br /> Page 32 of 37 <br />