My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/18/2015 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
05/18/2015 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2016 10:27:45 AM
Creation date
1/12/2016 10:27:41 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
At �, , <br /> MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,May 18,2015 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Leskinen stated it is probably not possible to include every possible scenario and that sometimes broader <br /> language is better. <br /> Schoenzeit stated if the City wants to exclude something, they should say that. <br /> Thiesse stated he is not advocating to not allow tattoo removal but that the Planning Commission should <br /> discuss that. <br /> Leskinen stated what service a person receives at a salon is also changing. <br /> Gaffron stated it is simple enough in the code to list all the things that are excluded. <br /> Leskinen asked if there are any particular services the Planning Commission would like to exclude. <br /> Leskinen stated in her view the Plymouth definition covers it very well and that she cannot think of a <br /> specific service that she would like to exclude. Leskinen stated the Coon Rapids' definition is broader. <br /> Curtis noted the City Attorney recommended the City specifically list the services the City would allow. <br /> Leskinen stated in that case the Plymouth example appears to be the most thorough and that she does not <br /> see anything in particular that should be disallowed. <br /> Lemke noted the Coon Rapids' definition states certified or licensed massage therapist by the city. <br /> Curtis stated the state licenses the aesthetician and hair people but that the City licenses the massage <br /> therapists. Curtis noted this definition would not change that process at all. <br /> Thiesse stated in his view tattoo removal would be allowed under the Plymouth definition. <br /> Landgraver stated in his view a tattoo parlor is not something that Orono would want to have but that <br /> perhaps the City Council could weigh in on whether it should be excluded. <br /> Thiesse commented a person may receive better service if the business provides more than one type of <br /> service. <br /> Schoenzeit stated the City cannot ask a business to offer multiple services. <br /> Gaffron stated he would suggest the Planning Commissioners drive around some strip malls in other cities <br /> to see if there is something that stands out. <br /> Thiesse asked if someone from Staff could call Plymouth to see what kind of problems they have had. <br /> Gaffron indicated Staff could call. <br /> Leskinen asked if Staff would like a specific recommendation tonight. <br /> Curtis stated that would be ideal, but that if the Planning Commission is not able to make that specific <br /> direction,they could table it. <br /> Page 35 of 37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.