Laserfiche WebLink
� � w <br /> MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,May 18,2015 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Bollis stated what is being depicted is a boilerplate house pad and is not going to be the exact house in <br /> that location. Bollis stated Lot 6 could accommodate a walkout but that it would be up to the builder. <br /> Bollis indicated he would like to design the homes according to the topography of the lots. <br /> Landgraver stated before the applicant goes before the City Council, he may want to consider some type <br /> of landscaping or screening to minimize the impacts to the neighbors. <br /> The Planning Commission took no formal action on this item. <br /> 7. #15-3732 CITY OF ORONO,AMEND CITY CODE SECTION 78-1 DEFINITIONS,ADD <br /> BARBER SHOPS AND BEAUTY SHOP, 10:05 P.M.— 10:20 P.M. <br /> Curtis stated the City was recently approached with a request to operate what was described as a high-end <br /> nail salon in an existing building in Navarre. Barber shops and beauty shops are permitted uses within the <br /> B-1 retail sales business district,the B-3 shopping center district, and the B-5 limited neighborhood <br /> business district. <br /> Currently there is no definition outlining what services are included in a barber shop or beauty shop <br /> within the zoning code. Staff is not proposing a change per se but rather to add a definition and perhaps <br /> the types of services to be provided so that when a similar question comes up, Staff would be better to <br /> answer it. Curtis noted it is not unusual for the use to be specifically defined, but that this is an <br /> opportunity for the City to put some parameters on the use. <br /> Staff has done some preliminary research as a starting point for the Planning Commission's review. In <br /> Staffls view,the Plymouth definition encompasses a number of the services that would normally be <br /> common. Staff is not proposing to change any of the language regarding the City's massage licenses. <br /> Curtis requested the Planning Commission look over the options and provide Staff with some guidance. <br /> Thiesse asked if the Planning Commission went with the Plymouth definition as it relates to nonsurgical <br /> cosmetic procedures, whether tattoo replacement and removal would be included in that or construed to <br /> beincluded. <br /> Curtis stated that is a good question and that the Planning Commission could decide whether it should be <br /> included in the definition. <br /> Schoenzeit stated if the definition does not specifically exclude that, it likely still would be covered given <br /> the broad language in the Plymouth definition. <br /> Curtis stated the Plymouth definition is a starting point that the Planning Commission could use. <br /> Leskinen opened the public hearing at 10:13 p.m. <br /> There were no public comments regarding this application. <br /> Chair Leskinen closed the public hearing at 10:13 p.m. <br /> Page 34 of 37 <br />