Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

THE FARM AT LONG LAKE - 820 Brown Road Norte, Subdivision Page 6 #317 3. Assurance of adequate on -site septic systems on all lots - possible conflict with City's position of no municipal sewering of this area After a lengthy discussion the Planning Commission agreed that many of the issues would have been resolved before approving the preliminary plat had they not felt rushed into a decision just before Christmas holidays. The Planning Commission tabled the proposal because many of the important Issues were unresolved for lack of data. The Planning Commission instructed the Zoning Administrator to request of the City Administrator that this proposal be added to the agenda for the Council meeting scheduled for March 16, 1978. The Commission felt the urgency Would require some direction from the City Attorney and City Council. They requested some direction on the following issues: I. Private read - width, surface, grade and drainage requirements 2. Conservation anJ pasture easements - determination of boundaries and use 3. On -site septic systems - necessity of soil borings and locating primary and alternate drain fields 4. Private access easement between Lots19 and 21 as alternate access for L)ts 20 and 22 from private read, Qutlot C - should this easement be indicated )n plat or in title S. Pedestrian eas�:nent on Lot 7 to shoreline of Lang Lake - extent and limits of use - possible conflict with City's policy of restri tion of riparian rights for properties not located on shoreline 6. Report from City Attorney confirming agreement with interpretations in letter from developer's attorney, Steven Pflaum, dated 3-7-78 1. Fence on wetlands - is variance necessary Chairwoman McDonald suggested that one member of the Planning Commission attend the next Council meeting to represent the position of the Comm I s s ion. The Planning ._:rmmission informed Tim Adams that after obtaining direction on these issues from the Council, the Commission would review the proposal again conditioned on developer providing the following additional niterial: 1. U)cation of ,;11 existing structures in reference to proposed lot lines so variances car be addressed 2. Private road detail (approved by Citv Engineer 3. Should private access easement between Lots 19 and ?1 he indicated on plat or in title (a►pproval of City Attorney) 4. Location of E- posed fences -:)-i wetlands if variances tre 0WessarN we ISM►" 6 A