Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Tim Ada: —is (Farm at Tong I hike) - 820 Brown Road North f}, yyr Variance - Zoning - Shoreline Requirement Pape 2 r '6 After further discussion, tli(- pl.+jintri'; Co' :,mission reco:'i •,�•,:(?, d api,r ,v••11 of the variance condi t i, ,i,_d on the fol-lowing st i pul at i,,n: The City Attorney review the ,nd +•t,nclude th it the pn j,cted conservation c,asvwent k,,,ild hi f-ict pr,.hiidt l,ikcsh,,re tise of L,,t 6 and restrict it from ainy r•ip.iri:in rights. The Commission continir(.:d with the review ind discussion regarding consideraitton of the fin it plAt ais prc tir -ILed. After a total discussh)n period exceeding 2 hours, the Cr>:emission finally tabled the issue of final plat approval for further review. They requested some additional data from the 4,volt er so the proper r, view could be made before a recommend -it iron t..r s fo j•'-ti -i rded to Counc i I. The Planning Commission was concerned about resolving the following issues before reaching any decision: 1. Certification of on -site scwgge di.spOS31 system ,)n all lots 2. Size all drainage structures with detailed plans and drainage calculations 3. Indication and legal description of flowage and conservation easements over wetlands 4. Determination of extent of use per —fitted on private 10 ft. lake access easements along lot lines of Lots 7 and 16. (Easements not indicated on plat and no evidence of legal description i agreement relating to these easements have been submitted for Plan.ing Commission review.) 5. Potential expansion of use of said lakeshore access easements 6. Boat docks - (location - size - number of slips and boats - setbacks and use rights). 7. Lack of association bylaws and agreements. The Planning Commission instructed the developer provide data and documentation for review by the City Attorney, Engineer and staff so reports relative to the sensative issues could be prepared for review by the Planning Commission before any action is taken. They also requested copies of the association bylaws and agreements. STAFF - March 2, 1978 Developer is rvapplyi, for approval of the final p •r This item was reviewed by the Planning Commission at their mearTng of 2-2 -78 without enough inforr,ttion. The final plait :-ipproval was requested by Tim. Adams :sltmg with the shoreline variance t-,-goust (Item #358). The final pla[ shc•uld actullly be litstod tinder Item #317 which was the original number given for this proposed plat. The variance request 0358) resulted from Council's direction to developer to return to the P1<innin,4, Commission wi,L)t a separate request for the subject varl-ince. .,`