Laserfiche WebLink
. ., <br />PAGE 4. <br />TO: Planning Commission & Council „I <br />FROM: Hank Mule i ch, Zoning Administrator <br />DATE: Febru,-try 'l , 1978 <br />SUBJECT: Tim Ad-t;:is (Farm at Long i:-eke) - 820 Rro <br />Variance - Zoning - Shoreline Rc tlui rainy <br />.ad North <br />This application is in relation to the prPni;)inary subdivision proposal <br />of the Farm at Long Lake (#317) . The VK noing Commi s5 icon recommended <br />approval of the preliminary on Decc:m r 5, 1977, subject to several <br />conditions. One of these conditi was that all lakeshore lots have <br />200 ft. of shoreline. <br />At the following Council m-. Ang Mr. Ac.ams r<.quested the shoreline <br />lots be approved as subm ted. The Council instructed the applicant <br />file a formal variance pplication for review and recomine�ndation by the <br />Planning Commission. <br />Since we are al familiar with the original plat and application I feel <br />we could waivprthe customary work session review and act on the issue. <br />NoTt <br />Exhibit A - APPLICATION <br />B - Reduced copy of preliminary plat <br />. N ►�/ indicating location of variance <br />2-7 request <br />PLANNING COMMISSION - February 27, 1978 <br />The Zoning Administrator intorduced the variance proposal. <br />Tim Adams, the developer, was present. <br />The PI -inning Com-mission reviewed the variance application. After some <br />discussion the Zoning Administrator informed the Planning Commission <br />that the developer was also requesting approval of the preliminary final <br />plat, copies of which were submitted at 4:15 P.M. on 2-23-78 (10 copies <br />only) and enclosed in their agenda packets. Although staff lacked the <br />time to prepare the necessary reports, Mr. Adams felt he might be able <br />to explain any questions the Commission might raise regarding the plat. <br />The request for the variance from the 100 ft. lakeshore frontage <br />requirement raised many questions. There was an indication of some <br />skepticism among the Commission members. Several motic-is were made, <br />but no decision was reached. Some of the niembers felt a decision on <br />length of lakeshore frontage was made at the original Public Hearing <br />on DecembE.r 5, 1977. At that time the Planning Commission recommended <br />approval of the preliminary plat subject to 15 conditions, one of which <br />was that all lakeshore lots meet the minimum 200 ft. l-ikeshore requirement. <br />The condition included altering lt,t. lines in a twinne'r to provide lakeshore <br />for only two lots. <br />