Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF SF'nTEMBER 21, 1981 Faye 2 <br />3 - City wil? <br />require <br />a conservation and <br />flowage easement. VAN t-,ECKHOU7 <br />over the wetlands <br />area. <br />(CONT.) <br />4 - Payment of <br />a bark <br />dt.:dicati,,n fee in <br />the amount ^f <br />$1, 400. 00. <br />7ach <br />lot fJ •; 20o. 00. <br />5 - Dedication <br />of 33' <br />of riuht: of way for <br />North Brown Rd. <br />6 - All access <br />to the <br />newly created lots <br />will he via the <br />platted road <br />- no <br />direct :access ollf <br />North Brown Rnad. <br />Goetten seconded. Vote: A-►-(rs 6; , *lays (0) . <br />Allan Larson was present. The landin,4 th,3t is propose-26 ALLAN LARSON <br />for the staircase is 6 feet. t,+ff has asked that the 3852 Cherry Ave. <br />landing be trimmed back 3' b- a? in_t t:a.� final access tConditional Use <br />abutt the retaining %%all. lie noted that all the Flans Permit <br />had been signed by a licensc,:i engineer. 0629 <br />Applicant reviewed his contractors suggestion to rvl)l,: ce <br />the planking with stone consisting of 8 inch graved to <br />permit adequate drainage. The are.: covered by the plinkinU <br />measures 8 x 251. <br />Goetten noted that our City Engineer recommended a itaLle <br />ground cover to help stabilize the lakeshore hanks. <br />Applicant noted that this was a heavily trafficked area <br />and what kind of ground cover would stand the useage. <br />Rovegno noted that the gravel wo:.ild allow the necessary <br />drainage and would also control the urosi(,n problem. <br />Applicant noted that the soil was marginal .and douht.ed <br />whether anything would ever crow there. Mabusth stated <br />that the City Engineer would be consulted. <br />Jabbour asked what the plans foe: the boat houst- ? <br />Applicant stated that hA had no Mans for any <br />and lie hoped to keep the building if at all possiLle. <br />Jabbour reviewed for the applicant the fact that this was <br />additional hardcover in a lakeshore area that was alre..idy <br />saturated with hardcuver problems. <br />Goetten asked how much of a ro(lucti )n in hardco,.- r s <br />resented in this application? Mabusth noted *.here wo-uld <br />k :. a red+action of 100 s f u ` h.irdcovcr b�, remov i n,a t h,_, <br />planking and replac.ii;,; wi ! `,-iiital,lr ;rc unii .1,) � r -,I ;rx.".: l . <br />The 12 x 2", boat house an . is i ._.tai I .:,Ise }:;si:;*., of 3:.' <br />sf of hard(7t:,ver. <br />Rovegno :- •-)vecl to appr-ve t1he l akc.shore improvement 1-1has( <br />of Larsai►'s original conditional use permit application <br />based on the fol lowin,l conditions: <br />1 - Access stairs bein,, re,locate.l p •r st if f <br />2 - Include removal of i'lL.:zkir►,-r :Ac' replarc w. t.!. t;rt and <br />cover her City Enginc ,-.r 's �iuggo.-tA ion. <br />3 - Rip raft alun�; shor�-i ►nt� <br />