Laserfiche WebLink
#02-2763 Clayt and Julie Tabor <br />960 North Brown Road <br />Pa e 3 of 4 <br />district. Following the 1980 sewer project the property owner did pay a sewer <br />assessment assuming future use of one of the two lots as a sewered building site. <br />Rezoning the property to I-acre was inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Other <br />properties in the area are all zoned 2-acre. The Council approved one lot to be less than 2 <br />acres based on the "agreement" that had been made by the 1980 resolution between the <br />City and the property owner. The MUSA separated the property to allow one lot to have <br />sewer access and the second, larger property was outside the MUSA. <br />Based on the number of subdivisions that have been approved in the City of Orono it would be <br />precedent setting to approve this proposed subdivision. An approval of the subdivision would <br />certainly open the opportunity for many properties in the City that have been combined or are <br />nearly large enough to subdivide to potentially do so. The two specific cases noted above had <br />some unique situations and history behind them to justify variances. <br />Comprehensive Plan <br />The property has been guided for 2-acre rural residential development by the 2000-2020 <br />Comprehensive Plan. The property has been zoned 2-acre since at least 1967. One recent change <br />to the property is its' recent inclusion into the MUSA allowing sewer connection to the property. <br />The provision of sewer to the property does not change the rural character intended for the district <br />and the land use classification. The Sewer Policy Plan, within the 2000-2020 Comprehensive <br />Plan states "Orono's urban and rural areas provide distinctly different lifestyles, amenities and <br />services which jointly benefit the community as a whole. Each area has separate planning <br />priorities and separate environmental considerations. Urban areas and urban services will not be <br />permitted to encroach on or destroy the rural community." (CMP 4C-6) <br />The property is defined as a rural area in the Comprehensive Plan. The closest area to the <br />property that is defined as urban would be the Sugarwoods neighborhood. The general sewer <br />policy goes on to say in order to protect Lake Minnetonka from the severe negative impacts of <br />excessive stormwater runoff that would be generated by development densities in excess of 1 <br />home per 2 acres, Orono will not allow residential development in the rural area at densities <br />greater than I home per 2 acres. <br />Sewer has been provided to a number of areas that are defined as rural areas. Generally the <br />preferred method of sewage disposal within the rural area is an individual on-site system. The <br />rural areas that have been provided with sewer service have done so because the lots were <br />developed prior to the adoption of current zoning standards. Many of the lots are substandard and <br />had non-compliant or failing septic systems. The size of the properties did not provide for future <br />septic sites so the logical solution was to provide sewer service to those areas. <br />Neighborhood Petition <br />The applicants have provided a petition signed by a number of surrounding property owners. The <br />petition is attached as Exhibit H.