Laserfiche WebLink
CxX-k k b ,i + H <br />MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 21, 1993. PAGE 7 <br />796 LACHLEN REED <br />1 BRACRETTS POINT RD <br />VARIANCE <br />[.oren Gardner, Lachlen Reed's contractor, was <br />present. Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that Mr. <br />Reed is asking for two variances for office occupation <br />since it is not on his homestead lot and that Mr. Reed is <br />asking for a paid employee to be included. Mabusth <br />noted that it would be a low volume office use. <br />Gardner noted that no additional building would be <br />involved and that Mr. Reed wants an office for himself <br />and his secretary. Gardner noted that Mr. Reed would <br />have the office in his house but that the house isn't <br />big enough and that Mr. Reed wants to preserve the <br />bedroom space. <br />Sime noted that although there has been no reaction <br />from the neighb.-rs you are violating every code the <br />City has. Sime noted from a practical standpoint it <br />is okay. <br />Chairman Rovegno asked about how much home signage <br />would be allowed. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that she didn't <br />think that Mr. Reed had proposed any type of signage, <br />but that the code has speci f is Standards for such use. <br />Goetten read sections from the zoning code which <br />specifically state that an office occupation use has <br />to be within the principal structure and you can't have <br />a paid employee. Goetten noted that this garage is <br />right next to the Pillsbury garage. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that it is an <br />allowed use under the home occupation section but that <br />this wouldn't be on Mr. Reed's homestead lot. <br />Chairman Rovegno noted if this applicatior was denied <br />that Mr . Reed wants his of f ice in the home that he could <br />apply to attach it to his home that would just require a <br />builds,.,: permit, which would increase hardcover on his <br />homestead lest. <br />Callahan noted that the garage -wild easily be turned <br />into an apartment because it has a bat'..room. Callahan <br />stated that the garage is not on the homeE-tea.1 lot so <br />the sections of the zoning c,)de that allow a 'home <br />occupation" don't apply because this is not in tie <br />principal structure. Callahan stated that the <br />var iance is for an accessory use :ind not the hom stead <br />lot. Callahan noted it was a recent subdivision that <br />created the lots this way too <br />