My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bracketts Point Road
>
1500 Bracketts Point Road - 11-117-23-34-0001
>
Land Use
>
83-796, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/31/2026 10:40:51 AM
Creation date
3/31/2026 10:40:09 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 21, 1983. PAGE 8 <br />#796 LACHLEN REED Goetten stated that it is an expansion use of a garage <br />(cont.) and that they are asking for a deck too. <br />Kelley asked what the hardship was? <br />Adams stated that there are many legitimate reasons <br />for denying the application b on she eF�' ablished <br />regulations. Adams noted co:. _ring the area and <br />spacing is such that there is no adverse affect on the <br />neighborhood, and that he is basicly in favor of <br />granting the variance. Adams noted that there are <br />employees going to work on the surrounding properties <br />(caretakers, etc). <br />Councilmember Adams stated that considering this <br />individual and the area that ?t shouldn't be a future <br />problem. <br />Callahan agreed as far as it would be Mr. Reed but that a <br />future owner could have two houses. Callahan stated <br />that a future owner could tear down the caretakers <br />house and garage and have another buildable lot. <br />Callahan noted that it is a variance to an accessory <br />use. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that where a new <br />owner comes in is where the problem starts. <br />Chairman Rovegno mDved to recommend r)proval to the <br />home occupation Section 32.340 based on the following <br />findings: <br />1. Office space is in a building detached from the <br />dwelling and on the separate lot from the owners <br />home, -'.-ad and owner does live on the abutting property <br />separated by an unimproved public right of way. <br />2. Lack of ability to employee an assistant that this <br />will provide for employment of a secretary. One <br />employee only. <br />Approval based on the following conditions: <br />1. Applicant to sign off on a resolution stating that <br />this accessory use ceases when applicant/owner no <br />longer owns both Lots 1 and 3, Block 1 - this special <br />home occupation use is only approved for applicant <br />while he owns both Lots t and 3, Block 1. <br />2. Any change in ownership would terminate this <br />special accessory use and the new owner of Lot 1 would <br />have to reapply for such use of accessory structure. <br />3. Remods-led structure cannot be rented out and shall <br />not be considered a legal rental unit. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.