Laserfiche WebLink
(1) Mr. Rhode's predecessor in title, Mr. <br />Fred Rogers, never had record legal title to the <br />lot at the same time he had record legal title to <br />any adjacent lot. <br />(2) Mr. Rhode's predecessor in title never <br />aad -in equitable interest in the lot at the same <br />t.imo he had an equitable interest in any adjacent <br />1nt-. <br />(3) It was never possible for Mr. Fred <br />Rogers to have combined what is now Jack Rhode's <br />lot with what is now Jason C. Becker's iot. By <br />the Lime Rogers acquired an interest in Rhode's <br />lot, he had given up his interest in Becker's lot. <br />22- 21. It is necessary that Mr. Rhode be granted <br />a variancf� as to lot size and width to preserve his <br />enjoyment of a substantial property right, to -wit: the <br />right to build a single family dwelling on an LP-1B lot <br />for which he paid $45,000. <br />23- 22. Without the variances as t,, '-,c size and <br />width, Mr. Rhode would suffer the i-..,Lticular hardship <br />of not being able to use hi< <esidential lot for residential <br />I)u rpos(-s . <br />24- 23. �Larl­ing the variances as to lot size and <br />width i:0 ' not be contrary to th., intent of the zoning <br />code. <br />a. There will be no threat to public health <br />occiiiring because of excessive crowding of private <br />sewn,.le disposal systems. <br />b. One more dwelling in the already developed <br />atoa will not materially increase the density, as <br />long as the present carriage house is removed <br />first, prior to construction. <br />C. Adequate open spaces for access in case of <br />fire will insure that there will be no increased <br />dann,,r to the safety of the neighborhood. <br />d. No impairment of morals will r.esilt from the <br />pr,-)f,•>sed construction of the single family dwelling. <br />e. the existence of one more dwelling in the <br />area will not materially increase the traffic in <br />the a rea . <br />-5- <br />