My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bohns Point Road
>
1410 Bohns Point Road
>
Land Use
>
77-#210, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2026 10:57:37 AM
Creation date
2/26/2026 10:53:06 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.,I FS OF A PL-14N.NING Ct?•P•IISSWN p¢;ITI'VG ItFI.D rt4Y 2, 1977 -PAGE 5 <br />Atr. Lauer had no qualms ahouit the location of Mr. Pthode's <br />stricture. However, he did feel that the lot was too <br />rall to contain both the carriage house and the proposed <br />_•1I ing. <br />Mr. Recker also objected to the use of the carriage house. <br />He. too felt that the lot was too small and this would <br />affect his value. He expressed his objection to the <br />proposed la.ation of the ck.'elling. He felt that the <br />car-iage house should be torn down and that the pioi„sed <br />stricture should he located near this snot. The Zoning <br />Ailministrator rcmindcsi Mr. Recker that the carriage house <br />is encroaching Mr. Laueis prolK:rty ncrw. It wc»rld he <br />better to locate the (1welling where there would be the <br />least amount of encroachr,:nt. <br />A long discussion followed reganling the location of <br />the proposed dwell ing. Not );rich progress in detennining <br />satisfactory location. The three interested parties could <br />not agree an location. Mr. Rhode stated that he would he <br />willing to go along with the suggestion of the Zoning <br />Administrator which was midu.,ay between the proposed <br />location and tine average setback line. <br />Planning ro;:missic,l indicated their objection to the else <br />of the existing car.-.ge house. They also indicated <br />objection to the rultiple dock on property. They suggested <br />q n in dock for use of surroimcling property owners }• -'rig <br />t:,,e access easement across s&jF•r_t property. <br />Pesek roved to approve the variance on the basis that the <br />existing building be removed before construction and that <br />the front part of the building, per se, he setback saiae <br />distance as the Recker resid^nce 30' ahead of line. Mot;nn <br />failed for lack of a second. <br />Has el moved, Hosfield -econded, to deny variance and that <br />a new application be submitted. motion failed. <br />Cuthrie moved, Pesek seconded, that the appl icat ion Le approved <br />si6ject to the house being setback a distance of 105 feet <br />from the lake as suggested by the Zoning a(Lministrator - midu;ay <br />between 75' lakeshore and average setback of the two adjoining <br />dwellings; no other variance than lot area and width be granted; <br />carriage house be razed as soon as the structure is constnrcted; <br />cw►e flock on this property; and subject to a Dark -ledication fee. <br />After soxae discussion. Githrie withdrew his motion. tassel t?-ien <br />moved to table the application and suggested Mr. Rhode s&mit <br />another revised plan indicating dimensions from lal%eshore in <br />Order to determine actual location and eliminate any future <br />controversy. Mot ion - Aves (S) , Nays (0) . <br />%o Rteode stated that he was sehel-led to be exit of town (luring <br />vur next %cheduled meet ing aid tl-.At h • would srrtunit a revised <br />pr"rwvsal for the June 6, 1977, ree ct ir.g. <br />JACK P00DE <br />(continued) <br />(# 210) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.