Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

011O11O COUNCIL IWETING HELD JANUARY 26, 1976 P-•-ie 7 Henry 11uhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, informed the City Council that Mr. Peter Fox Mis representing fir. Rogers in his request for two variances on the property located at 1410 Bolin's Point Road. The lot area and width variances were approved over one year ago with several conditions. Iie is now requesting a similar variance but has added the request for a variance from the rear yard setback requirement. Several parties have shown an interest in purchasing the-roperty if the existing barn -garage is located ly 24' from the rear lot line. The old house shown on the survey has been piartically razed, however, hazardous conditions do exist as much of the debris has been left on the site and the existing excavation is unprotected. fir. Fox has been informed that this proposal wox.zld be deferred iinti.l these conditions are corrected. Planning Commission Meeting - January 5, 1976 The Commission directed that a copy of the Jay Decker letter be submitted to the Village council. The Commission made a Tr.--)tion that lir. Fox, agent for Fred Rogers, Jr., he informed that because of the applicant's lack of represe.itation and because the hazardous conditions at the property site had not })v vn corrected, the petition be tabled. Zoning Administrator - January 12, 1976 The applicant has again been reminded to resolve the problem of debris and hazardous excavation. Planning Conunissi.on .Ie-tinrr - January 19, 1976 .he Planning Commission took no action. The debris and excavation problem is not yet resolved. VARIANCE 1410 Bohn`s Point Roau Henry rluhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, VARIANCE informed the City Council that Mr. Johnson is 1376 Park Drive requesting variances from lot area and rear set- back requirements. This area is zoned LR-lB which . t fiuires one acre (43,560 sq. ft. ) area and a rear yard setback of 30'. This lot ,i less than 11,900 sq. ft. and the kwtear yard setback would require a 20' variance (2/3 of the requirement). I would recommend denial because of the extreme non -conformities and although sewer does exist in the area, this parcel was never assessed a unit charge. (Only lateral). (Continued)