Laserfiche WebLink
SPECIFIC ISSUES UR TOPICS <br />It should be pointed out that the issues identified below have been raised ei- <br />ther in the interviews or by at least one of the two task forces. The fact <br />that they are included does not mean that the issue has merit. Their presence <br />mer=ly indicates that one or more influential organization supports the state- <br />ment, ti.ux indicating that the issue needs to be addressed in the Management <br />Plan. <br />Lake Surface Access <br />Definition: Lake access is defined as access to the lake water surface during <br />summer or winter for the purpose of conducting a recreational or <br />commercial activity. <br />Background: <br />Bummer and winter activities are covered by this section of the plan. The ac- <br />tivities include boating, swimming, fishing from a boat, scuba diving, waterski- <br />ing, ice skating, cross-country skiing, snowmobiling, ice fishing, use of <br />seaplanes and ultra -light aircraft. <br />Presently, the ways to access the lake for boating are from: <br />1. private riparian lands, <br />2. municipal lands with access allocated on a priority system or limited <br />to residents of that community, <br />3. multiple residential developments, <br />4. private commercial marinas and yacht clubs, <br />S. public launch ramps, and <br />6. public corridors without formal access facilities <br />Access to the lake shoreline for warm season mctivitics includes municipal and <br />regional parks and ramps on the mainland or on islands as well as at various io- <br />formal public lands. The letter groups includes primarily fire lanes that re- <br />main in public trust, but are no longer needed for their intended purpose. <br />Access to the lake surface for winter recreational activities are essentially <br />similar to those for boating. Some communities open fire lanes closed during <br />the warm se+son for access during the winter. <br />Based on interviews with key informants and review of existing recreational use <br />wtudkes, none seem to have completely documented recreational access for both <br />aummer and winter activities. <br />I ssuea Identified: <br />i. Existing general public access is lacking, at times, in quality and <br />opportunity. <br />2- The boat density standard for Lake Minnetonka needs to be <br />determined. <br />1. Additional public access is needed in the southwestern portion of <br />the lake, specifically iu Minnetrists. <br />