07-28-1986 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

File #1026 .l: ?3, 1986 Page 3 Additional C-ximents and Planning Commission Recommendation Additional :_whibits Exhibit F - Vogt's Letter Exhibit G - Will's Letter Exhibit H - Vogt's & Hilbelink's Letter Exhibit I - Sketch of Planning Commission Recommendation At the July 21st meeting of the Planning Commission, the applicants and future owners of Lot 1 were given the opportunity to address their concerns regarding staff's proposal to define a north/south link to the future extension of Woodhaven Drive via a minimum 60 feet wide corridor on the east side of Lots 2 and 3 (review Exhibits 8, C & D). Their positions have been presented in writing, please review Exhibits F, G & H. They may be summarized as follows: 1. The proposed access corridor along the east lot lines contain the majority of mature trees on the subject property - construction of the through road would require the removal of these trees. 2. The future house sites have been chosen because of thei- interior location far from the travelled roads and noise and safety concerns of the road traffic. 3. The trree applicants all plan to maintain large acred lots. Owners of Lots 2 and 3 will independently seek lot splits and owner of Lot 1 plans a lot line rearrangement with corner undeveloped lot (see Exhibit C and D) to main- tain horses for his children. City can postpone acquisition of additional rights -of -way until a future subdivision when development of vacant surrounding properties is more de- fined. 4. If the corner parcel at the intersection is developed at some future date requiring a private road, the road outlot should be *-ken completely out of the subject property as access fo. t 3 is at the east side of parcel and would afford no c.t benefit for Lot 3 or future divided lot. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recomme, ed that the north/south link be relocated within a 60 foot wide corridor per the enclosed staff sketch (Exhibit I) further east. This specific access location was approved for future development of Lot 2 within the Hallson Estates plat and should be reviewed by the City Engineer if approved as future through road by Council. This would be the most central or mid location of the half section but not of the remaining undeveloped lands of the half section as would be the corridor recommended by staff.