Laserfiche WebLink
City Facilities Assessments <br />March 20, 1986 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />1. Bonding- The general means of developing alternative <br />facilities is through the sale of general obligation bonds. These would be <br />no different then the special assessment bonds that have been sold in the <br />past. They would generally however have a lesser interest rate together <br />with the fact that they would require that it be submitted to the <br />electorate in order for such bonds to be issued. Participation by other <br />organizations such as other communities, Post Office, Library etc, in a <br />joint. development may raise some questions under current. the Grahm-Rudman <br />Bill as to the tax exempt status of the bolds. <br />2. Lease -Purchase- In recent years legislation has been passed <br />to allow for a community to acquire capital equipment or buildings through <br />the use of a lease -purchase arrangement with a private finance company. <br />This is structured so as not to require a vote of the public. The City <br />would however need to keep current with lease payments or it would lose the <br />facility. At the end of the term of the lease the City can generally <br />purchased the property for a dollar. Financing in this manner would be <br />favorable in part due to the depreciation credits available. Further <br />investigation of this option is needed ii the Council would be interested. <br />(It maybe appropriate that the City buy the land on which the building is <br />sited in order to firm up their interest in the lease.) <br />3. Sale of Property- The City does have a number of properties <br />scattered through out. the City. It maybe appropriate to sell these in <br />order to generate additional cash which could be used to finance a <br />facility. Even without a new facility it would be pruden' to sell this <br />property as the City has no interest in maintaining them. (Principal among <br />these properties are 25 acres acquired for McCauley Road together with <br />property in Crystal Bay the Cit; would care if it went to a different <br />facility.) <br />4. Existing Cash Balance- The City could look at utilizing its <br />rather substantial cash balance as a means to fund a facility on the front <br />end and utilize tax anticapation certificates for Its cash flow until such <br />as its restored through taxation. A variation maybe "Investing" the funds <br />construction of a new facilities. <br />RECOMMENDATION -- Based on the issues above it is staff's recommendation <br />that Orono relocate all its facilities to one site separate from Crystal <br />Bay with one maybe two buildings. This would be located in the community <br />on any number of possible locations shown on attachment E. In addition to <br />the City relocating its facilities the City could explore with abutting <br />communities such as Spring Park anJ Minnetonka Beach and see if they have <br />any interest in sharing facilities. This would still be convenient to <br />their communities without the City of Orono ahsorhing them. Additionally <br />it may be prudent to discuss with the post office the development of a <br />consolidated postal facility. Other cooperative options may look at <br />providing maintenance space for agencies such as Hennipen County Parks for <br />servicing the Norenberg property and Rig Island should they ever attain it <br />and LMCD for maintenance should I,MCD become involved in operations with <br />facilities on the lake. <br />