Laserfiche WebLink
City Facilities merits <br />March 20, 1986 <br />Page 5 of 5 <br />While no firm cost figures for space have been developed or an <br />approximate cost f-)r a financing recommendation, the staff brings this <br />issue to the Council for discussion to identify issues related to exploring <br />alternate facilities. Whatever the cost today it would probably be done <br />at a much cheaper price toda} then in 20 years. This is not only because <br />of construction costs but also because the increase in cost and decrease in <br />the availability of alternate sites that would not be faced with <br />conflicting uses. Attachment F is a tentative time table indicating the <br />events that may need to take place in order to go from the current <br />facilities to a new facility. Attachment G represents designs of <br />alternative facilities done in 1980 on the present Crystal Bay site. They <br />do not all address significant revamping of the Public Works facility. <br />Proposed motion: Move _ 2ND _ That the City Council <br />accept the assessment report for discussion at its April 28, 1986 meeting. <br />Ayes , Nays <br />