Laserfiche WebLink
as <br />to <br />City of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. <br />The granting of the vaziances will serve mainly <br />a convenience to the applicant, and is not necessary <br />alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. <br />16) The applicant has not introduced any evidence contrary to <br />any of the above findings of fact. The applicant has <br />claimed only that combined Tracts C and D woLld be of <br />greater value to him if he could sell it to a third party <br />with the variances necessary to build a home upon it. <br />17) The granting of such a variance would require the <br />extension of City water and sewer to maintain the <br />standards setforth in the Orono Zoning Code and <br />Comprehensive Plan for an urban sized lot. <br />18) In granting such a variance, Council would abandon a <br />longstanding, consistent policy in consideration of <br />the buildability of substandard lots under common <br />ownership and thereby establish an adverse precedent. <br />19) In order to put everyone on notice that the above <br />referenced substandard lots in common ownership n..ust <br />remain under ::ommon ownership to maintain the existing <br />house as a conforming use, Council hereby directs the <br />City staff to file such notice against the properties <br />legally described as Tracts C, D, E, and F, R.L.S. 96. <br />Adopted by this Cite Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota <br />on the _ —_ day of 1981. <br />William II. Van test, tAior <br />Al TEST: <br />Alberta M. Strom, City Clerk <br />_y___ <br />