Laserfiche WebLink
#915 Roland Amundson <br />Page 2 <br />July 2, 1985 <br />2. The bank began to Crode with the early spring rains after the <br />trees and brush were removed. 'he applicant complied with <br />all staff's requests for 6pe fic erosion control steps. <br />Photos were taken of the banks in early spring for your review. <br />The banks have restored themselves with the natural groun-i <br />allowed to return--photes taken June 13, 1985 will confirm <br />restoration. The applicant was asked to submit a landscape <br />plan showing replacement of trees, planting of shrubs and safe <br />access to lakeshore. Ahilicant was specifically asked to <br />show how access stairs would tie into the old boat house <br />foundation and, if permil-.t_ed, new deck. The landscape plan <br />has been submitted for ur review --see Exhibit D. <br />3. A non -conforming structure or ►,�, i,t house located 4-5 feet off <br />the shore had been dismantle:: except for three sides of the <br />foundation walls. The remaining foundation provides much <br />needed stability for the bank. The applicant was in the <br />process )f constructing a deck within the foundation walls. <br />He was asked to stop all construction of the deck and it remains <br />as it was on March 13th--photos were taken July 13, 1985 for <br />confirmation. <br />The applicant will replace the mature trees removed last spring. The <br />plantings noted on the schedule are all acceptable and will provide the <br />necessary erosion control on the very steep bank. The steps and <br />1c nding areas must be trimmed back to maximum allowed width of 4 feet. <br />Erosion control must be provided when the plants and trees are <br />installed at sometime in the future. There is no pan' c or emergency or <br />need to require immediate planting because the banks have restored <br />themselves. <br />The real issue now is th remaining boat house Ftructure. To remove <br />the foundation would create major problems for this very steep bank. <br />To fill over the skeleton of the foundation is not feasible given the <br />steep bank and the closeness of the structure to the water. The <br />applicant wishes to improve the look of his lakeshore but most <br />important to provide afe access down the steep bank. <br />Staff had suggested at the Planning Commissi.>: mee 3 that as a <br />compromise the City allow the 12' x 16' fc .ion I�o be used as a part <br />of the structure that provides access to If the deck platform <br />remains, a 36 inch railing must be provided mound all open sides. The <br />4' wide access stairs must be structurally tied into the <br />platform/foundation. The visual impact from the lakeshore would be <br />minimized with the reduced structure and the propc.sed plantings. <br />