My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-08-1985 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1985
>
07-08-1985 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2025 10:50:28 AM
Creation date
12/4/2025 10:42:10 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
314
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
U AWA �111; iiyG <br />T• City Coun--il <br />FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Adbi <br />nj Qr. <br />DATE • July 2, 1985 T'!t.i�tjJ O <br />SULi ECT. #915 Roland C. Amundson, 3135 Casco Circle - After is -Fact <br />Conditional Use Permit and Variance <br />Zoning District - LR-lC <br />Area - 18,000 sf <br />Application - After -the -fact Conditional L?^e Permit and Variance <br />required major al'erat of non -conforming <br />structure. <br />Pertinent Ordinance: <br />1. Section 10.03, Subdivision 5(H) major structural <br />repair of non -conforming structure <br />List of ' s <br />Exhibit A ._,plication <br />Exhibit B - Property Owners List <br />Exhibit C - Plat Map <br />Exhibit D - Neighbors written r;-)roval <br />Exhibit E - Landscape Plan <br />Photos will be available for review <br />Review of Application <br />On March 13, 1985, staff inspect the lakeshore of the subject <br />property. Staff observed the I swing violations: <br />1. Approximately 90 percent of the shoreline bank r 3 been <br />cleared of trees and brush--8 to 10 were over 5 inches in <br />diameter. The applicant had advised they were all dead. 'he <br />inspector had observed in a latcr inspection that some of the <br />trees removed appeared to be alive --photos were taken of the <br />trees for review at our meeting. *n -- .: c3plicant. was asked to <br />submit an expert opinion as to the .:onditioi. the trees at <br />remova. (landscape architect, forester, e.:t.) Planning <br />Commission did not fen1 this was ftecessary as the trees are <br />gone. It is ..ire important to deal with res.-oration and <br />conservation issue. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.