Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

}.1JNuTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMJSSION MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 17, 1994 (#7 -#1967 -K-P Properties/Olson -Continued) Gaffron reported the initial request was to subdivide the Olson residence from a 17.5 parcel leaving the rear property as an outlot for future development and an outlot with an access for future development. The plan was modified to facilitate the sale of the Olson residence. It includes a 2.3 acre lot, an outlet for a road, an outlot to be later transferred to adjacent property, and an outlot for future development. This would not include the Geffre property but would include an easement to connect a back road to Bayside. The question still arose whether the Olson property would be able to connect to an interior road. Another option was for an easement for a west access should the White property be acquired. It was determined that the White property would not be acquired and a 4-lot division wi11 occur of this property. At the last Council meeting. the plan was revised to not include the Geffre property, thus, creating an outlet with an easement. Gaffron noted a letter from City Attorney Barrett regarding concern over enforcement of the successors or heirs of the Geffre property to be bound to the terms of the easement agreement previously laid out. The Geme property is now part of the plan through an agreement so this matter may no longer be of issue. The plan is now the same as that requested by the City Staff, leaving options available and controls with.in the resolu6on what will happen under different scenarios of development. The park fees will be deferred on the outlot until it is developed. Gaffron said both access possibilities have been approved by the County and are workable. The residence does have a failing septic, and Gaffron noted it will be replaced at a new location. Schroeder voiced concem over the issue brought up by Barrett in his letter. Gaffron commented that any approval should stipulate the need for the City Attorney's approval as well. Mr. Peterson reported having a new signed agreement with Geffre binding successors and assignment should that occur, and a deferred agreement to make a transfer if Outlot B is used. Peterson also said the issue of the variances requested at the last Planning Commission meeting has been resolved. The plans now call for 200+' frontage on Bayside Road and 50+' from the deck. Peterson reiterated why the plan is in two phases in order to facilitate the sale of the Olson property. He noted the comment given by the City Council at their meeting for the desire of the input of the Planning Commission.. Mayor Callahan interjected to the Commission members that if they as well as the City Attorney were agreeable to the terms of the proposal, the City Council \vould be wi11ing to look at this issue at their next meeting. :Mr. Olson commented on the importance of timeliness in this matter. 6