My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-25-1985 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1985
>
02-25-1985 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2025 11:32:01 AM
Creation date
11/13/2025 11:28:28 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
176
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
It was moved by Spensley, seconded by Lehman, that the <br />foregoing applications be tabled pending receipt of all required <br />exhibits. Upon vote the motion carried. <br />City of Minnetonka - recreational trail from Grays Bay dam to <br />Crosby Road, Sec. 8D, Grays Bay Dam, Minnetonka. 84-92 <br />The engineer reviewed the application of the City of <br />Minnetonka for construction of a recreational trail from Grays Bay <br />Dam to Crosby Road across the Grays Bay Dam weir and control <br />structure. The engineer reported that the staff has reviewed <br />methods to limit public access to the control structure and to <br />safeguard the passage of pedestrian and bicycle traffic across the <br />structure as proposed by the City. The engineer noted that <br />commen',s Have been received from the Hennepin County Sheriff's <br />Water P..'rol and the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, both <br />of which support the fencing as proposed. The DNR Boat and Water <br />Safety Division recommended a higher fence and a placement of <br />warning signs around the perimeter. The engineer stated that <br />comments are also to be delivered by the DNR Division of Waters <br />and the Hennepin County Department of Environment and Energy. <br />The Managers reviewed the proposal recommended by the <br />engineer. The tanagers requested that the engineer revise the <br />configuration at the upstream side of the structure to cause the <br />fencing to be extended slightly lakeward of the shoreline to <br />provide additional Barriers to access to the structure. The <br />Managers further directed the fencing be installed to a height of <br />six feet. Following discussion, it was moved by Carroll, seconded <br />by Lehman, that the application be approved and that the District <br />fund 5U per cent of the cost of material and labor for fence <br />construction not to exceed $1,000, with the fence to be <br />constructed as shown in the engineer's drawing with the following <br />modificaticn: extend the fence further from the wingwalls along <br />the shoreline and that the final fence height (42' to 72') be <br />determined based on staff review of maintenance requirements. <br />Gerald `loberman - boat ramp renovation, Sec. 27B, Tonka Bay <br />Marina, Echo Bay, Tonka Bay. 85-01 <br />The engineer reviewed the application for installation <br />of a replacement boat ramp in the same location as an existing <br />ramp. The engineer recommended approval upon the engineer's <br />receipt and approval of a construction drawing of a typical <br />cross-section of the ramp as recommended in the written memorandum <br />..le - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.