Laserfiche WebLink
Secti^r. A.03 Subdivisioo 15(D) <br />D. In side or rear aards onl bays not to t:ceed a depth of two <br />`.eet nor Co contain an areamore than twenty square feet, fire <br />excace.c� not to exceed a width of three feet, fences and walls not <br />to excee•) a height of six feet above grade anc� open off-street <br />parking _ _ -- ---_ r� �.._ <br />Proposed As-nenelment <br />�) In s,' )r rear yards only, bays not to exceed a depth of two <br />f-:et nor .,onta::, an area of more thatv twenty square feet, fire <br />excapes r to exceed a width of three f•-et, fences and wa l is not <br />to exceec.. h-might of six feet above grade and open off street <br />parking ex•a_pt for lakeshore lots, no fence or wall that exceeds <br />42 inches Tn heigni may be located closer to the shorelines than <br />ttie average �istance eon the s`orel�ne o existing residence <br />butliffn_g_s_ oii adjacent lots, soch—fences shall not be constructed <br />-- <br />within 5 Tee* of the shoreline � <br />If Council does not agree with the Planning Commission <br />re ommendations regarding average setback lines, the code will <br />cortinue to allow privacy fences as an accessory structure 75 <br />feet from the shoreline and as a rion-encrrachment at the front <br />line of the house. Approve the ordinance subject to staff <br />excluding the amendment to Section., 10.22 Subdivision 1 and 10.0i <br />Subd' •vision 15 (D). <br />The Planning Commission expressed strong interest in drafting a <br />new ft•: :-- ---finance. Staff circulated a survey of various <br />performance 4'_::.,ldar-�s that were to be reviewed and submitted back <br />to staff by December 10th for direction in drafting a new <br />ordinance. Staff received one telephone call from a Planning <br />Come on member that opined a new ordinan•-,., would no'--- be needed <br />if the current amendments were enacted. <br />If Cr ,•il wishes fur�her study or cont;i :erat.ion (-,)rlr-errinq i i.ew <br />fence tdinanc_e, please advise stiff. <br />