My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-03-1985 Council Packet Special Meeting
Orono
>
City Council
>
1985
>
01-03-1985 Council Packet Special Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2025 12:49:34 PM
Creation date
11/4/2025 12:46:12 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
231
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The service -providing role defined for the cities and townships is flc: .. <br />Contracting with private collection companies is encouraged. Col Iectioi, respon- <br />sibilities could also be assumed by the counties. However, it is essential <br />that counties adopt collection ordinances by 1988 for mandatory source separa- <br />tion requiring participation of their residents. Municipalities must adopt <br />their county's mandatory source separation collection ordinance by reference or <br />more stringent ordinances. The cities and townships should also help the <br />counties with development of intermediate processing facilities by at least <br />assisting with analysis of site alterratives. The larger, more central cities <br />could even take over the role of project developer if coordinated with the <br />respective county. If the private sector or constituent municipalities do net <br />provide these source separation scrvices, the metropolitan counties must assure <br />adequate development. <br />One of the most important roles of the counties is to assure orderly and coor- <br />dinated development of multi -material, intermediate processing or transfer <br />facilities for identified recyclables. Centralized sites with adequate er,uip- <br />ment may be necessary for the regional source separation objectives to be <br />attained. These facilities could be planned in conjunction with the mixed <br />waste processing facilities, perhaps even at the same sites. Furthermore. <br />intercounty coordination may enhance the economic feasibility of these recycl- <br />abies processing plants and promote cooperative marketing of the materials. <br />The role of the Metropolitan Council shall be overall coordination, including <br />1) clarification and monitoring regional goals and objectives, 2) technical <br />assistance to help establish programs, 3) financial assistance, and 4) research <br />and development, especially in terms of markets and long-term financing mecha- <br />nisms. The role defined for private companies is to provide adequate collec- <br />tion, processing and publicity services in cooperation with the counties and <br />municipalities that develop the various contracts. <br />Factors Influencing Participation <br />Mandatory Source -Separation Ordinances <br />Mandatory separation ordinances should not specify where the material must no. <br />They should simply state that the identified material shall not be placed with <br />the mixed municipal solid waste. Haste reduction (that is, mulching and back- <br />yard composting) should be emphasized within the ordinances to reduce the <br />volume of yard wastes requiring separate collection. The generators' right to <br />decide what they wish to do with the material once separated should be pre- <br />served. For example, if some residents have decided to collect grass clippings <br />rather than mulch, they could bring that material to a neighborhood composting <br />bin rather than set it out for separate collection. Similarly, residents would <br />be allowed and encouraged to sell their aluminum cans at a redemption center or <br />donate their newspapers to a charity group rather than set them out for sepa- <br />rate, on -route collection. The choice remains with the waste generator. <br />Legal enforcement actions, such as fines, may be an option made available <br />within the local ordinance. The municipality may still decide not to enforce <br />in this manner. However, mandatory programs should provide adequate publicity <br />about the ordinance and the potential legal consequences for non-compliance. <br />Also, notices could be left on garbage cans or at the door of residents deter- <br />mined to be violating the ordinance. <br />47 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.