My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-03-1985 Council Packet Special Meeting
Orono
>
City Council
>
1985
>
01-03-1985 Council Packet Special Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2025 12:49:34 PM
Creation date
11/4/2025 12:46:12 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
231
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Convenience and Reliable Servi,c <br />Four factors can determine the level of convenience to the waste generator for <br />separate collection of recyclables and yard waste: 1) frequency and time of <br />pickup, Z) degree of preparation that the material requires, 3) provision of <br />household containers, and 4) degree of reliability for pickup. <br />Once -a -month frequency of collection for recyclables is the minimum that must <br />be provided to achieve minimally adequate participation rates. Preference <br />should be given to programs that can provide more frequent service. For <br />instance, twice -a -month service can be optimal for separate collection of recy- <br />clables, depending the specifics of the community and its program design. <br />However, because of cost implications, once -a -month shall be the region -wide <br />standard for those identified urban and suburban portions of the Metropolitan <br />Area. <br />Frequency for yard waste collection should be once a week during the growing - <br />season months, especially spring and early summer. This material should not be <br />allowed to sit unattended for any longer because of potential odor problems <br />from grass clippings, which are defined as part of compostable yard waste. <br />Drop-off sites may be provided as an alternative to on -route collection of yard <br />wastes. However, these sites must be located conveniently enough to achieve <br />comparable participation rates. Roll -off boxes used to collect yard wastes and <br />then haul it to centralized composting facilities could be provided as an alter- <br />native to permanently established bins or sites. Neighborhood composting bins, <br />possibly in conjunction with neighborhood gardens, could also be an acceptable <br />alternative. <br />The amount of material preparation required of the generator depends on market <br />specifications and what the intermediate processing is designed to do. The <br />region currently has only minimal mechanized processing capacity for recycl- <br />ables and yard wastes, and therefore the waste generator must prepare materials <br />to a high degree (for example, removing metal and plastic contaminants from <br />glass containers). The counties should place a priority on establishing inter- <br />mediate processing centers for recy^lables and yard waste materials so that the <br />level of convenience to their residents can be improved. Intermediate process- <br />ing centers should be established or. a multicounty basis to optimize haul dis- <br />tances, efficiencies of scale and cooperative marketing potentials. These <br />intermediate processing facilities should be operating by 1988 to correpond to <br />the mandatory source -separation requirement. In the meantime, residents must <br />continue to separate and clean their materials as needed to provide adequate <br />quality of supply. <br />Providing household containers for recyclables add,. ' convenience and <br />personal satisfaction for residents. It can also sr a publicity tool to <br />remind neighbors to set out their materials. Count J municipalities <br />should give consideration to providing household cc ..rs. <br />Continuous Publicity <br />Participation cannot be developed, increased or maintained unless a permanent <br />and well -designed publicity campaign is established for each program. This <br />essential factor can not be replaced by other means to achieve high participa- <br />tion. Content, format and method of delivery are not as important as the con- <br />tinuous nature of information about the particular program. For instance, it <br />is desirable to deliver or mail a program noti-e once every six months, and <br />preferably more often, for a year-round source separation program for <br />recyclables. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.