My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-10-1984 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1984
>
12-10-1984 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2025 2:40:19 PM
Creation date
11/3/2025 2:27:49 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
376
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. <br />1. Public notice by both the City and Hennepin County <br />that lots released for sale may not satisfy all zoning <br />standards. <br />2. The applicant's father and actual purchaser of the lots <br />had worked with officials of the City on two previous <br />zoning applications. <br />3. The applicant is involved in building construction and <br />should have a general familiarity with development <br />practices. The very fact the property is tax forfeit <br />would strongly suggest to even a building novice that <br />there may be problems with the buildability of a property. <br />20. The granting of the required variances would result in the <br />following violations of Section 10.08 Subdivision 3.A of the <br />Zoning code with which the applicant must first comply before the <br />requested variances can be granted. <br />a) in review of the factual findings noted above, the plight <br />of this applicant was created by his own actions and has <br />nothing to do with a unique hardship related to the land. <br />b) In reivew of the factual findings noted above, the City <br />finds that the e3sential character of the neighborhood <br />will be altered i a building permit is issued for this <br />property. <br />c) In review of the factual findings noted above, the City <br />finds that to establish a precedent that would allow <br />Beverly substandard lots to be developed to be in complete <br />conflict with the established environmental standards for <br />lakeshore development within - he City and to be <br />detrimental to the public, health, safety and welfare. <br />The City also looks to the broader, environmental <br />principals and goals set forth in its Community Management <br />Plan and the intent of the specific zoning dis-riot when <br />dealing with matters related to the public, health safety <br />and welfare. Issues involving the public health, safety <br />and welfare are not only resolved in securing the obvious <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.