Laserfiche WebLink
City of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COI!'NCIL <br />NO. <br />variance to lot area would establish a negative precedent in the <br />future development of the Minnetonka Summit Park neighborhood. A <br />review of the ownership pattern of the remaining vacant lots <br />reveals one, two lot combination and three, single lots. <br />19. The standards and intent of both the City's Zoning Code and <br />Community Management Plan would no longer have any effect if the <br />City establishes a precedent of approving variances of this <br />degre,. The LR-lB Zoning District alone contains 88 vacant lots, <br />34 or 39% of these fall within 20-40 percent of the required <br />are . The findings cited in each of the variance applications <br />reviewed in this resolution presented unique circumstances. In <br />review of similar criteria, what is unique about Fisk's request <br />in consideration of the following facts: <br />a) A previous fee owner failed to amend the variance <br />application of 1977 and acquire additional lots at the <br />time they were available. <br />b) There is no structure on the property. The previous <br />-(>sidence was razed in 1976 and had not been in use since <br />the mid 1950's. <br />c) A two lot building site is not consistent with current <br />pattern of neighborhood development. The smallest <br />building site approved since 1975 totaled .52 acres, but <br />that lot had an additional 12,000 sf of land separated or <br />divided by an unimproved public road. <br />d) The property was not assessed a full sewer unit because <br />the property was substandard in 1973 when the sewer <br />district was established. The intent of the sewer <br />assessment policy has been stated for the public record - <br />one quarter unit for each vacant, substandard lot. <br />e) The question of the <br />code standards prior <br />to the city appears <br />fol lowing facts: <br />applicant's knowledge of the zoning <br />to application for a building permit <br />questionable in consideration of the <br />L" <br />