My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-10-1984 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1984
>
12-10-1984 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2025 2:40:19 PM
Creation date
11/3/2025 2:27:49 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
376
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. <br />zoning code requirements prior to purchase, Any hardship <br />seems to be self imposed. <br />e) This is a tax forfeit property. <br />f) A total of one-half sewer unit was charged indicating <br />intent on the part of City that the lot is substandard. <br />g) No ie I sewer assessment was laid against this property <br />them gain indicating the substandard status of the <br />propel <br />h) The property falls short so far of the zoning standard <br />that it is too great to enable justification of granting <br />of the variances requested. <br />i) The property does not conform to the current development <br />pattern of the neighborhood. <br />17. In denying this application, the City upholds its previous <br />action in denying lot area and lot width variances for the same <br />property (August 27, 1977, - dome Federal Savings and Loan) in <br />consideration of the fo'lowing: <br />a) The same performance standards are still in effect today: <br />LR-1R (effective January 1, 1974) 1 acre area - 140' <br />width <br />R-1C (effective September 14, 1967) 1 ac-e - 140' width <br />b) At the direction of the 1977 Council, the applicant was <br />advised to acquire the vacant lots. An owner of the <br />adjacent vacant lot appeared at one of the publ:.c <br />meetings and was advised to contact applicant to arrange a <br />lot combination. <br />c) The property has not been improved and st i 1 1 requires an <br />excessive area variance. <br />18. Approva 1 of an app 1 ica;. ion that requi res a 75 per cent <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.